• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Pediatric Obstructive Sleep Apnea: Many Causes, Many Treatment Options

by Pippa Wysong • January 1, 2007

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version
John Houck, MD

You Might Also Like

  • Can Lingual Tonsillectomy Improve Pediatric Obstructive Sleep Apnea?
  • Obstructive Sleep Apnea Options
  • Is Nasal Surgery Effective Treatment for Obstructive Sleep Apnea?
  • Staging and Treating Snoring and Obstructive Sleep Apnea
Explore This Issue
January 2007
John Houck, MD

Studies suggest that child-sized masks work well, although custom masks are needed for children with craniofacial deformities. To determine which pressure works for a patients means having to do a CPAP titration.

A significant issue with CPAP is getting kids enthused about it and getting parents onboard. With good compliance, CPAP in kids is reportedly 86% effective.

CPAP is effective, it’s safe. You need extensive parental involvement. And it’s a reasonable alternative in difficult patients, Dr. Houck said.

Oral Appliances for OSA Children

For OSA due to orofacial causes, oral appliances may be useful, said David H. Darrow, MD, DDS, from the departments of otolaryngology and pediatrics at Eastern Virginia Medical School.

The two main groups of candidates for oral appliance therapy are long face and small jaw patients. Those with a long face have a long, lower anterior face, a steep mandibular plane, high arched palate, or narrow maxilla. A small jaw patient has a retruded mandible or short ramus.

Oral appliances are designed to increase the space available for respiration, whether it’s trying to affect the nose or trying to affect the oral cavity or pharynx, he said.

There are three main types of devices. One type is the maxillary expander, which increases the transverse dimension of the patale and expands the intranasal space. Studies show that these devices improve nasal resistance, as well as tongue position. Maxillary expanders need to be anchored to the first permanent molars.

The second group include mandibular repositioners and tongue retention devices, which are designed to position the tongue more anteriorly. Mandibular advancement devices are appliances that move the jaw forward and bring the tongue along with them passively. The idea is to increase the anteroposterior diameter of retroglossal space, Dr. Darrow said.

Children should be selected for mandibular repositioning carefully, Dr. Darrow said. Some tolerate the device poorly. Also, children with severe obstruction get only a small improvement in OSA. If they’re severely obstructed you should probably be looking at other solutions, he said.

Tongue retention devices use a suction bulb to hold the tongue forward, but are too uncomfortable for children.

The third type of device is the palatal lift device, designed to elevate the soft palate away from the tongue base. These devices are not very effective for OSA.

Data from a recent Cochrane Review suggest that CPAP is often more effective than oral devices. The problem is that CPAP is often poorly tolerated, so oral devices should be considered sort of a backup device for patients who may not tolerate CPAP, Dr. Darrow said.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 | Single Page

Filed Under: Articles, Clinical, Features Issue: January 2007

You Might Also Like:

  • Can Lingual Tonsillectomy Improve Pediatric Obstructive Sleep Apnea?
  • Obstructive Sleep Apnea Options
  • Is Nasal Surgery Effective Treatment for Obstructive Sleep Apnea?
  • Staging and Treating Snoring and Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939