• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

PET Not Ready for Routine Management of Head and Neck Cancer

by Ed Susman • April 1, 2006

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

NAPLES, Fla.-The use of positron emission tomography (PET) is not sensitive enough to warrant routine use in post-curative chemoradiation therapy diagnosis of patients with node-positive head and neck cancer, according to researchers in the field.

You Might Also Like

  • PET-Directed Management of Node-Positive Head and Neck Cancers
  • Survival for Advanced Head, Neck Cancer Improvements May Be Related to PET
  • PET/CT Useful for Head and Neck Cancers, with Limitations
  • What Is the Role of PET-CT in Residual Occult Nodal Disease?
Explore This Issue
April 2006

At least two recent studies have shown that after chemoradiotherapy, neck dissections indicate that as many as 38% of patients have residual cervical metastatic disease.

The use of computer-assisted tomography (CT) in evaluating patients following the node-positive neck after organ preservation therapy has been unreliable, said Victoria S. Brkovich, MD, a resident in the Department of Otolaryngology at the University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio.

In delivering the G. Slaughter Fitz-Hugh Resident Research Award here at the Southern Section Meeting of the Triological Society, Dr. Brkovich said that studies with CT show that the images have a sensitivity of 85%, specificity of 24%, and positive predictive value of 40%.

With those shortcomings in mind, some researchers have looked to PET imaging to predict residual cervical metastatic disease after treatment with chemoradiotherapy.

A significant number of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma with N2 or N3 disease harbor residual metastases despite an apparent clinical response. – -Christine Gourin, MD

Why Use PET to Detect Cancer

She explained that when patients are injected with the positron-emitting radionucleotide 18-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG), the radionucleotide is taken up in cells by glucose transporters. Its distribution is a measure of glucose metabolism.

Because neoplasms generally demonstrate increased glucose metabolism, the uptake of 18-FDG PET may detect and localize a viable tumor.

In her study, Dr. Brkovich recruited 21 patients in a prospective case series in 2004 and 2005 who had undergone curative surgery and chemoradiation for squamous cell cancer of the head and neck. To be included in the study, patients had to have had biopsy-proven squamous cell carcinoma of the upper aerodigestive tract, node-positive neck disease, completion of the chemotherapy or chemoradiation protocol, a complete response at the tumor site, a post-treatment PET scan, and salvage neck dissection.

The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were calculated based on the comparison of the PET scan result and the histopathological result of the corresponding neck dissection sample, she said.

Results Lacking Specificity, Sensitivity

The histopathological report found four neck dissections were positive for residual squamous cell carcinoma and the other 17 specimens were negative.

Dr. Brkovich said there were three true positive PET studies and one false negative PET study among the four specimen-positive findings. There were 11 true negative PET studies and 6 false positive PET studies.

Pages: 1 2 3 | Single Page

Filed Under: Departments, Head and Neck, Medical Education, Practice Focus, Tech Talk Tagged With: cancer, carcinoma, CT, diagnosis, Imaging, PET, radiation, research, technologyIssue: April 2006

You Might Also Like:

  • PET-Directed Management of Node-Positive Head and Neck Cancers
  • Survival for Advanced Head, Neck Cancer Improvements May Be Related to PET
  • PET/CT Useful for Head and Neck Cancers, with Limitations
  • What Is the Role of PET-CT in Residual Occult Nodal Disease?

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939