• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Post-Chemoradiation of Head and Neck Cancer: SND and Aspiration

by Jennifer Decker Arevalo, MA • October 1, 2007

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version
Alexander Langerman, MD

You Might Also Like

  • Chemoradiation vs. Surgery: Which is Better for Head and Neck Cancer?
  • Randomized Trial Shows No Benefit of Intra-Arterial Chemoradiation Delivery in Head and Neck Cancer
  • Pretreatment Swallowing Assessment in Head and Neck Cancer Patients
  • PET Not Ready for Routine Management of Head and Neck Cancer
Explore This Issue
October 2007
Alexander Langerman, MD

Findings from the study showed that pathologically, 22.4% (13/58) of the patients had viable tumor cells identified in the neck dissection specimen. Seventy-two percent of the patients are currently alive and 28% died as a result of distant disease, local or regional recurrence, or other causes. Of those patients who died from distant disease, 13% had pathological evidence of residual tumor cells identified in the neck dissection specimen. Of the patients who died from local or regional disease, 40% had pathological evidence of residual tumor cells identified in the neck dissection specimen.

Our study demonstrated that performing SND after radiation or chemoradiation did not adversely affect the regional or distant control when compared to historical controls and resulted in similar rates, said Dr. Jacobson. Earlier studies indicate that regional and distant control after a modified radical or radical neck dissection preceded by radiation therapy or chemoradiation approximated 83%8 and 88%,9 respectively.

This study demonstrated pathological evidence of viable tumor in 22.4% (13/58) of the patients after undergoing primary radiation or chemoradiation. We believe that this percentage of persistent viable tumor following treatment supports the need to perform staged SNDs in patients after completion of their adjuvant therapy, said Dr. Jacobson.

SND represents a reasonable surgical alternative to the classic radical and modified radical neck dissections for the management of N2, and possibly N3 disease, after primary medical treatment, continued Dr. Jacobson.

In time, SND may replace the radical and modified radical neck dissection for patients with low-volume (N1, N2) disease and in some cases of higher-volume neck disease that either have a partial or complete response to the chemoradiation, as in our study, said Dr. Jacobson. However, it will not replace the radical and modified radical neck dissections for high-volume disease that has clinically invaded major structures, such as the internal jugular vein, sternocleidomastoid muscle or the accessory nerve.

Preoperative imaging is invaluable in helping to determine whether an effective SND can be performed, continued Dr. Jacobson. One must carefully evaluate the preoperative imaging to make the judgment that a selective neck dissection is the appropriate procedure for any given patient.

Aspiration

During his presentation at the American Head and Neck Society meeting, Dr. Langerman provided results from a study that was done as an adjunct to a larger, prospective, multi-institution clinical trial of induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiation for advanced head and neck cancer for whom oropharyngeal motility (OPM) study data were available.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 | Single Page

Filed Under: Head and Neck Issue: October 2007

You Might Also Like:

  • Chemoradiation vs. Surgery: Which is Better for Head and Neck Cancer?
  • Randomized Trial Shows No Benefit of Intra-Arterial Chemoradiation Delivery in Head and Neck Cancer
  • Pretreatment Swallowing Assessment in Head and Neck Cancer Patients
  • PET Not Ready for Routine Management of Head and Neck Cancer

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939