ENTtoday
  • Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Allergy
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Departments
    • Issue Archive
    • TRIO Best Practices
      • Allergy
      • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
      • Head and Neck
      • Laryngology
      • Otology/Neurotology
      • Pediatric
      • Rhinology
      • Sleep Medicine
    • Career Development
    • Case of the Month
    • Everyday Ethics
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Medical Education
    • Online Exclusives
    • Practice Management
    • Resident Focus
    • Rx: Wellness
    • Special Reports
    • Tech Talk
    • Viewpoint
    • What’s Your O.R. Playlist?
  • Literature Reviews
    • Allergy
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Events
    • Featured Events
    • TRIO Meetings
  • Contact Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Triological Society
    • Advertising Staff
    • Subscribe
  • Advertise
    • Place an Ad
    • Classifieds
    • Rate Card
  • Search

Chemoradiation vs. Surgery: Which is Better for Head and Neck Cancer?

by Pippa Wysong • April 1, 2006

  • Tweet
  • Email
Print-Friendly Version

While chemoradiation is becoming more common for managing head and neck cancers, some patients should have surgery as an initial treatment

You Might Also Like

No related posts.

Explore This Issue
April 2006

TORONTO—There has been a paradigm shift in the management of oropharyngeal and laryngopharyngeal cancer, and top surgeons now opt more frequently for chemoradiation treatment than surgery. At the same time, otolaryngologists–head and neck surgeons need to do their best to determine which patients are not good chemoradiation candidates and should undergo surgery as a first modality.

These were among the key messages presented by a panel of five experts who discussed head and neck cancers at the recent meeting of the Eastern Section of the Triological Society here. The panel, moderated by Ashok Shaha, MD, Professor of Surgery at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center in New York City, covered treatment options in response to a series of questions and sample cases presented.

Radiation Therapy: Good for Many Patients

Radiation therapy came out as top choice for the management of early vocal cord cancer, though panelists provided different reasons. It isn’t for all levels of cancer, and it doesn’t discount the value of other specific treatments.

Jeremy L. Freeman, MD, Professor of Otolaryngology at the University of Toronto in Ontario, explained that radiation is the treatment of choice at his center, in part, because there isn’t enough manpower for doing laser ablation. “We’d need one person dedicated to do this job two or three times a week, and we just don’t have this resource. We do have a radiation resource and that’s what we do.” He added that laser ablation is cost-effective, and that radiation can be used later on if there is a recurrence.

Gady Har-El, MD, Professor of Otolaryngology and Neurosurgery at SUNY Health Science Center in Brooklyn, NY, said it depends on the whether the cancer is T1 or T2 since they need different levels of aggression in treatment.

And, while radiation is often effective, it doesn’t work for everyone, a point made by Jonas Johnson, MD, Chair of Otolaryngology at the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine (Pa.).

Figure. Drs. Ashok Shaha, Jeremy Freeman, Gady Har-El, Bert O'Malley, Jr., and Jonas Johnson (left to right) debated treatment options for head and neck cancer at the Triological Society Eastern Section meeting.

click for large version
Figure. Drs. Ashok Shaha, Jeremy Freeman, Gady Har-El, Bert O’Malley, Jr., and Jonas Johnson (left to right) debated treatment options for head and neck cancer at the Triological Society Eastern Section meeting.

“The best data suggest 70% of patients with T2 laryngeal cancer are cured with radiation, which means a 30% failure rate. If those [failed] patients are carefully followed, they can often be treated with partial laryngeal surgery.” However, if patients are not followed carefully, 30% of the failed patients lose their larynx, which is “an abomination,” Dr. Johnson said.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 | Single Page

Filed Under: Departments, Head and Neck, Laryngology, Medical Education, Practice Focus Tagged With: cancer, carcinoma, debate, laryngectomy, outcomes, patient safety, radiation, surgery, thyroid cancer, treatment, tumorIssue: April 2006

You Might Also Like:

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

The Laryngoscope
Ensure you have all the latest research at your fingertips; Subscribe to The Laryngoscope today!

Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
Open access journal in otolaryngology – head and neck surgery is currently accepting submissions.

Classifieds

View the classified ads »

TRIO Best Practices

View the TRIO Best Practices »

Top Articles for Residents

  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Why More MDs, Medical Residents Are Choosing to Pursue Additional Academic Degrees
  • What Physicians Need to Know about Investing Before Hiring a Financial Advisor
  • Tips to Help You Regain Your Sense of Self
  • Should USMLE Step 1 Change from Numeric Score to Pass/Fail?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?
    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?
    • Vertigo in the Elderly: What Does It Mean?
    • Keeping Watch for Skin Cancers on the Head and Neck
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?
    • Vertigo in the Elderly: What Does It Mean?
    • What Happens to Medical Students Who Don’t Match?
    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?
    • Resident Unions Are Growing in Popularity in Otolaryngology
    • Is Caring for the Homeless and Uninsured Really Someone Else’s Problem?
    • Otolaryngology Practices Use Digital Tools to Pre-authorize—With Mixed Results
    • A Look at the Past, Present, and Future of DEI Medical Education Initiatives
    • Barbie, Bullying, and Bravery: Ending Workplace Bullying Requires Strong Leadership

Polls

Do you think resident unions are a positive development for otolaryngology?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive
  • Home
  • Contact Us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences

Visit: The Triological Society • The Laryngoscope • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology

Wiley
© 2023 The Triological Society. All Rights Reserved.
ISSN 1559-4939