• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Protecting Medical Devices against Cyberthreats

by Mary Beth Nierengarten • September 24, 2017

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version
© Lagarto Film / shutterStock.com

© Lagarto Film / shutterStock.com

Over the past year, several events have given legs to the growing body of concern over the potential for medical devices to be compromised by hackers. Security tests of various devices by expert hackers and security laboratories have shown that a range of devices, from implantable insulin pumps to defibrillators, pacemakers, and other medical electronics, are vulnerable to hacking. The potential for such hacking to compromise a medical device recently became reality by the spread of a malware virus, “WannaCry” ransomware, that was able to compromise a variety of medical equipment such as imaging systems and dye injectors (Wired. Published March 2, 2017.).

You Might Also Like

  • Senate Bill Targets Medical Device Cybersecurity
  • Mobile Devices in the Medical Setting Can Lead to Distracted Doctors and Medical Error
  • How the U.S. FDA Approves Medical Devices
  • New Excise Tax Applicable to Otolaryngologist Devices
Explore This Issue
September 2017

What has emerged is the need to protect medical devices against a two-fold cyberthreat. First is the need to protect individual patients from the potential for harm if the device itself is compromised, such as a hack into an insulin pump that resets the device to administer a fatal dose of insulin to the patient. Second, systems must be protected against being hacked through the portal of a medical device, an easy entry point to a hospital network that could lead to stealing medical records.

To that end, a number of government and non-government agencies are working together to address these risks and ultimately protect patients while securing their privacy.

Risk to Otolaryngologic Devices

Although no known vulnerability risk has been detected in medical devices used in otolaryngology, such as cochlear implants and hearing aids, the potential exists for such vulnerability.

“Any medical device that can be connected through wired or wireless means to an external device, typically for the purpose of changing control settings, can conceivably be hacked,” said Stephen L. Grimes, managing partner at medical technology consulting firm Strategic Healthcare Technology Associates, based in Swampscott, Mass. “The external device might be a controller, a computer, a thumb drive, or other remote storage device,” he added.

To date, however, no specific cybersecurity concerns have been reported for devices used by otolaryngologists, and concern over this issue is not yet widespread among the specialty, according to Kenneth H. Lee, MD, PhD, chair of the American Academy of Otolaryngology Head & Neck Surgery (AAO-HNS) Medical Devices and Drugs Committee.

He believes that the security risk to current technologies used for cochlear implants and hearing aids, such as the use of Bluetooth streaming from smart phones to adjust settings, is limited. “I don’t think there is significant concern about individuals desiring to randomly access settings of a patient’s implant or hearing aid,” he said.

Pages: 1 2 3 | Single Page

Filed Under: Departments, Tech Talk Tagged With: cybersecurity, cyberthreat, hacking, medical cybersecurity, medical cyberthreats, medical hackingIssue: September 2017

You Might Also Like:

  • Senate Bill Targets Medical Device Cybersecurity
  • Mobile Devices in the Medical Setting Can Lead to Distracted Doctors and Medical Error
  • How the U.S. FDA Approves Medical Devices
  • New Excise Tax Applicable to Otolaryngologist Devices

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939