ENTtoday
  • Home
  • COVID-19
  • Practice Focus
    • Allergy
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Departments
    • Issue Archive
    • TRIO Best Practices
      • Allergy
      • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
      • Head and Neck
      • Laryngology
      • Otology/Neurotology
      • Pediatric
      • Rhinology
      • Sleep Medicine
    • Career Development
    • Case of the Month
    • Everyday Ethics
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Medical Education
    • Online Exclusives
    • Practice Management
    • Resident Focus
    • Rx: Wellness
    • Special Reports
    • Tech Talk
    • Viewpoint
    • What’s Your O.R. Playlist?
  • Literature Reviews
    • Allergy
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Events
    • Featured Events
    • TRIO Meetings
  • Contact Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Triological Society
    • Advertising Staff
    • Subscribe
  • Advertise
    • Place an Ad
    • Classifieds
    • Rate Card
  • Search

Reference Pricing and Otolaryngology

by Richard Quinn • December 7, 2016

  • Tweet
  • Email
Print-Friendly Version

The numbers may not seem striking in otolaryngology, but in 2011, when CalPERS set its maximum payout for a knee or hip replacement at $30,000, the amounts quickly added up. Patients “flocked to lower-priced hospitals and outpatient surgical centers,” wrote health economist Austin Frakt, PhD, in the New York Times (August 8, 2016.) Prices and total spending for the procedures plummeted.

You Might Also Like

No related posts.

Through the program, CalPERS saved $2.8 million, or approximately $7,000 per patient, on hip and knee replacements in 2011 over 2010 rates, according to the Center for Studying Health System Change, a Washington, D.C., think tank founded by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (Health Affairs. 2013;32:1392-1397). Patient cost sharing decreased by roughly $300,000, or $700 per patient.

 

Will Otolaryngology Be Impacted?

James Denneny III, MD, executive vice president and chief executive officer for the American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, said his organization has been tracking reference pricing closely for years. While no otolaryngology procedures are currently included in the CalPERS program, Dr. Denneny said he must prepare should other states or private insurers eventually decide to include such procedures as tonsillectomies or tympanostomy tube insertion in their reference pricing programs.

He thinks that the yield in otolaryngology is so low, percentage-wise, and the cost to institute this pricing model by the payers so great, that otolaryngology won’t see much of it. “My suspicion is that the people who are most interested in doing it are the private insurers, and the overall bill for otolaryngology services is still low enough where I don’t think we’re looking at it in the next three to five years,” he said. “There may be trial models by certain larger hospital systems, but it’s an issue that, from a federal dollar point of view, is not a big spend.”

Still, Dr. Denneny noted that, in an era of value-based care, alternative payment models, and an overall move away from fee-for-service spending, otolaryngologists need to determine the best care to provide their patients and then determine the appropriate costs for that care.

Dr. Brown added, “Otolaryngologists can determine procedures that are likely targets for reference pricing by simply ranking ENT procedures that meet the reference-pricing criteria by national aggregate reimbursement.”

Dr. Sun said that good candidates for this pricing model would be high-volume, elective procedures for which there might be a wide variation in cost but not necessarily a big difference in quality. For example, tonsillectomies and tympanostomy tubes might be good candidates, he added. These are single procedures for which follow-up may not necessarily be as complex.

Pages: 1 2 3 | Single Page

Filed Under: Departments, Health Policy Tagged With: policy, reimbursement

You Might Also Like:

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

The Laryngoscope
Ensure you have all the latest research at your fingertips; Subscribe to The Laryngoscope today!

Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
Open access journal in otolaryngology – head and neck surgery is currently accepting submissions.

Classifieds

View the classified ads »

TRIO Best Practices

View the TRIO Best Practices »

Top Articles for Residents

  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Why More MDs, Medical Residents Are Choosing to Pursue Additional Academic Degrees
  • What Physicians Need to Know about Investing Before Hiring a Financial Advisor
  • Tips to Help You Regain Your Sense of Self
  • Should USMLE Step 1 Change from Numeric Score to Pass/Fail?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?
    • Neurogenic Cough Is Often a Diagnosis of Exclusion
    • What Happens to Medical Students Who Don’t Match?
    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • What Happens to Medical Students Who Don’t Match?
    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?
    • Vertigo in the Elderly: What Does It Mean?
    • Neurogenic Cough Is Often a Diagnosis of Exclusion
    • Why We Get Colds
    • Are the Jobs in Healthcare Good Jobs?
    • What Really Works in Functional Rhinoplasty?
    • Is the Best Modality to Assess Vocal Fold Mobility in Children Flexible Fiberoptic Laryngoscopy or Ultrasound?
    • Three Primary Treatment Strategies Show No Differences in Swallow Outcome for Patients with Low- to Intermediate-Risk Tonsil Cancer

Polls

Do you have physician assistants in your otolaryngology practice?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive
  • Home
  • Contact Us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences

Visit: The Triological Society • The Laryngoscope • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology

Wiley
© 2023 The Triological Society. All Rights Reserved.
ISSN 1559-4939