• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Researchers Present Findings at 2016 TRIO Combined Sections Meeting

by Thomas R. Collins • April 11, 2016

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Junior residents were much more likely to report that the number of resources available is overwhelming. Asked to choose a single tool that would most improve their case preparation, residents chose, in almost equal numbers, a database of surgical videos, a resident-oriented website for graduated understanding, and a tool for finding “top-rated” resources.

You Might Also Like

  • Otolaryngologists Gather for 2016 TRIO Combined Sections Meeting
  • Panel Discusses Case Management of Head and Neck Cancers at 2016 TRIO Combined Sections Meeting
  • Triological Society Presents Otolaryngology Awards at 2014 Combined Sections Meeting
  • New Otolaryngology Research Highlighted at Trio Sections Meeting
Explore This Issue
April 2016

“Case preparation is certainly not consistently rated as effective or efficient by residents right now, and while there does seem to be some progression through residency, there seems to be room for improvement in that at all levels,” Dr. Jabbour said. “There does seem to be some need for future resource development, but at the same we would like to improve the way we’re using the resources we already have.”

Thirty-Day Hospital Readmission Following Otolaryngology Surgery

An analysis of 30-day readmissions across more than 58,000 otolaryngology inpatient surgery discharges and a variety of hospital types has found that patient factors—and not hospital-level factors such as whether the surgery was performed at an academic center or not—are the main driving force behind whether or not a patient will be readmitted.

The analysis, from investigators at Washington University in St. Louis, Mo., used information from the State Inpatient Database, which is available through the U.S. Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project. In that database, patients are given a unique identifier, allowing them to be tracked over time, which overcomes a limitation of other literature—losing track of patients if they are readmitted at a center other than the original location of the surgery.

Researchers looked at the readmissions of California residents from 2008 to 2010. The data set included 58,748 discharges, approximately 500 of which were excluded because the original length of stay was more than 90 days or the surgery was done at a center with fewer than 10 otolaryngology admissions. The overall readmission rate was 8.1%, said Evan Graboyes, MD, a resident at the Washington University, who presented the findings.

Although univariate analysis showed that readmission rates were somewhat higher in teaching hospitals than non-teaching hospitals and in hospitals that serve a disproportionate share of low-income patients, those associations disappeared upon multivariate analysis, he said. “Variation in readmission rates between hospitals is driven by patient factors, not hospital factors,” Dr. Graboyes said.

Facial plastics and trauma (OR = 0.54) and endocrine procedures (OR = 0.77) were less likely to result in readmissions. Patients on Medicaid (OR = 1.27) or Medicare (OR = 1.54) were more likely to be readmitted, as were those with certain co-morbidities, including anemia, chronic lung disease, and renal failure. Surgical complications during the original hospital stay were not associated with a higher readmission risk on multivariate analysis, but medical complications during the original stay were (OR = 1.52). The highest risks for readmission were seen for patients discharged with home healthcare (OR = 2.23) or to a skilled nursing facility (OR = 2.21).

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 | Single Page

Filed Under: Features Tagged With: abstracts, keloid analysis, readmission risk, Sections Meeting 2016, tonsillectomy pain, Triological SocietyIssue: April 2016

You Might Also Like:

  • Otolaryngologists Gather for 2016 TRIO Combined Sections Meeting
  • Panel Discusses Case Management of Head and Neck Cancers at 2016 TRIO Combined Sections Meeting
  • Triological Society Presents Otolaryngology Awards at 2014 Combined Sections Meeting
  • New Otolaryngology Research Highlighted at Trio Sections Meeting

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939