• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Resident and Fellow Participation Associated with Potential Opportunity Costs for Attending Head and Neck Surgeons

by Linda Kossoff • May 13, 2024

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

CLINICAL QUESTION

What is the opportunity cost of training residents and fellows for head and neck surgery?

You Might Also Like

  • High-Volume Hospitals, Surgeons Better Predictors of Overall Survival in Head, Neck Cancer
  • Survey of Head and Neck Cancer Surgeons on Bereavement Practices Shows Wide Variation
  • With Change Looming, Head and Neck Surgeons Look in the Mirror
  • Otolaryngologists-Head and Neck Surgeons Urged: Be Part of the Solution in Health Care Reform
Explore This Issue
May 2024

BOTTOM LINE

Work relative value unit (wRVU)-based physician reimbursement does not consider or adjust for the extra effort involved in training future head and neck surgeons.

COMMENT: wRVU aims to capture the time, work, skill, judgment, and stress associated with a given service. In many employed-physician models, wRVUs have been utilized to define baseline productivity goals and bonus incentive targets. Yet, this may not be appropriate in academic settings and particularly with complex cases such as those performed by head and neck oncologists. This novel study provides initial evidence of the opportunity cost borne by teaching residents and fellows. Additional studies exploring compensation models that take into account the time necessary for education, research, leadership, and citizenship behaviors with a goal to achieve fair and equitable pay should be encouraged. —Sarah Bowe, MD, EdM

BACKGROUND: The RVU was created to quantify the economic value of medical care. Critics assert that RVU-based care leads to a “volume over value system” that incentivizes procedures over non-procedural activities. There are additional considerations in teaching institutions, where those practicing with trainees have significant responsibilities in addition to direct patient care.

STUDY DESIGN: Data study.

SETTING: Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, New York University, New York.

SYNOPSIS: Researchers mined data from the American College of Surgeons National Surgery Quality Improvement Project for ablative head and neck surgical procedures performed by otolaryngologists between 2005 and 2015. The team identified 34,078 patients (64.6% female, median age 49 years) who underwent procedures. Procedures were grouped into five categories: thyroid/parathyroid (63.2%), salivary gland (20.3%), oral cavity (8.8%), lymph node dissection (5.7%), and larynx/pharynx (2.0%). Median procedure length was 114 minutes. Researchers compared the wRVUs generated per hour among procedures performed by attendings alone (n = 3,645), attendings with residents (highest post-graduate year [PGY] level 5 or lower / n = 29,453), and attendings with fellows (PGY 6 or greater / n = 980). The rate of wRVU generation per hour was greatest for attendings alone (10.3), followed by attendings with residents (8.9), and attendings with fellows (7.0). Resident and fellow involvement was associated with opportunity costs of $60.44 per hour and $78.98 per hour, respectively, and decreases in the number of wRVU generated per hour of 1.8 and 2.3, respectively. Findings showed that the education of residents and fellows was associated with significant opportunity costs to attending head and neck surgeons. Study limitations included lack of trainee participation information post-2015.

CITATION: Chow MS, Gordon AJ, Talwar A, et al. The RVU compensation model and head and neck surgical education. Laryngoscope. 2024;134:113–119.

Filed Under: Literature Reviews, Medical Education Issue: May 2024

You Might Also Like:

  • High-Volume Hospitals, Surgeons Better Predictors of Overall Survival in Head, Neck Cancer
  • Survey of Head and Neck Cancer Surgeons on Bereavement Practices Shows Wide Variation
  • With Change Looming, Head and Neck Surgeons Look in the Mirror
  • Otolaryngologists-Head and Neck Surgeons Urged: Be Part of the Solution in Health Care Reform

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939