• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Rewriting the Rules of Rhinosinusitis

by Jennifer L.W. Fink • January 9, 2026

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Additional research may change the equation. Now, it is generally less expensive to treat CRS with polyps with surgery, “even if you have to do multiple surgeries and combine surgical treatment with topical medical therapies,” Dr. Turner said, than to utilize biologic medication. The discovery of specific biomarkers may eventually allow physicians to diagnose and treat CRS—with or without polyps—based on endotype rather than phenotype. And if research ultimately reveals that it’s possible to de-escalate biologic treatment over time, without decreasing the efficacy of treatment, the cost (financial and otherwise) of biologic therapy may decrease to the point that it may reasonably be considered as first-line therapy in some cases.

You Might Also Like

  • Are All Cases of Sinusitis the Same?
  • The Etiology of Chronic Rhinosinusitis Remains Unclear
  • Report May Change Diagnosis, Management of Chronic Rhinosinusitis
  • What Otolaryngologists Need to Know about Biologics and Allergic Rhinitis
Explore This Issue
January 2026

“If you change the dosing schedule from every two or every four weeks to every eight or 12 weeks, you’ve completely changed the economic model for the decision tree,” Dr. Turner said, noting that some published studies have already suggested that extending the dosing schedule of dupilumab does not appear to negatively affect symptom control (Laryngoscope. 2025;135:2267- 2274; Allergy. 2023;78:2684-2697).

As research continues to clarify the mechanisms and markers of sinus disease, treatment decisions will keep evolving. The 2025 guidelines for the medical and surgical management of adult sinusitis provide a clear framework for evidence-based, patient-centered care. For otolaryngologists, they reinforce best practices while challenging clinicians to communicate updated treatment protocols to patients and colleagues in primary and urgent care.

Key Changes in the 2025 Sinusitis Guidelines

  • Watchful waiting is now the first-line for all uncomplicated acute bacterial rhinosinusitis.
  • Biologics restricted to CRS with nasal polyps; not recommended for CRS without polyps.
  • No required “step therapy” before surgery; antibiotics or steroids aren’t mandatory prerequisites for endoscopic sinus surgery.
  • Post-operative care standardized: follow-up at three to 12 months, with structured outcome assessment and patient counseling

Jennifer Fink is a freelance medical writer based in Wisconsin.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 | Single Page

Filed Under: Features, Home Slider, Practice Focus, Rhinology Tagged With: New Guidance for RhinosinusitisIssue: January 2026

You Might Also Like:

  • Are All Cases of Sinusitis the Same?
  • The Etiology of Chronic Rhinosinusitis Remains Unclear
  • Report May Change Diagnosis, Management of Chronic Rhinosinusitis
  • What Otolaryngologists Need to Know about Biologics and Allergic Rhinitis

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Has your practice or department been affected by the lack of anesthesiologists?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of the ENTtoday Editorial Board
  • A Resident’s View of AI in Otolaryngology
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • Resident Pearls: Pediatric Otolaryngologists Share Tips for Safer, Smarter Tonsillectomies
  • A Letter to My Younger Self: Making Deliberate Changes Can Help Improve the Sense of Belonging
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • Rewriting the Rules of Rhinosinusitis

    • Office Laryngoscopy Is Not Aerosol Generating When Evaluated by Optical Particle Sizer

    • Some Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Resists PPI Treatment

    • Top 10 LARY and LIO Articles of 2024

    • Empty Nose Syndrome: Physiological, Psychological, or Perhaps a Little of Both?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Keeping Watch for Skin Cancers on the Head and Neck

    • Applications Open for Resident Members of the ENTtoday Editorial Board
    • Bottleneck In the OR: How Anesthesiologist Shortages Threaten Surgical Care
    • Onboarding and Working with APPs
    • Evaluating Treatment Patterns in Bell’s Palsy Using Nationwide Employer- Sponsored Healthcare Claims
    • Randomized Trials Comparing Inferior Turbinoplasty Techniques for Nasal Obstruction

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2026 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939