• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Technology
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
    • SUO Corner
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Technology
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
    • SUO Corner
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Should Surgery Be First-Line Treatment for Head and Neck Cancer?

by Margot J. Fromer • March 1, 2009

  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

He acknowledged that it is difficult for patients to live with uncertainty, but when the risk is so low, it’s more dangerous to overtreat.

You Might Also Like

  • Is Speech Language Pathologist Evaluation Necessary in the Non-Operative Treatment of Head and Neck Cancer?
  • Most Patients with Early Stage Glottic Carcinoma in National Cancer Database Receive Radiation as First-Line Treatment
  • Chemoradiation vs. Surgery: Which is Better for Head and Neck Cancer?
  • Targeted Therapy a Potential Treatment for Head and Neck Cancer
Explore This Issue
March 2009

CRT appears to work for stage 3 tumors. It is effective in about two-thirds of patients-about the same percentage as surgery combined with radiation, especially in cancer of the larynx, any treatment for which produces significant side effects. However, surgery carries more mutilating effects than CRT. Therefore, the latter has become the therapy of choice for stage 3 patients.

In stage 4 disease, CRT may not restore function. Therefore, surgical resection plus adjuvant CRT may be more appropriate. Patients with advanced adenopathy usually require CRT, but the jury is still out about surgery adding benefit for them.

That’s it in a nutshell, but of course, the decision to choose a treatment is more complicated than that. Physicians are responsible for understanding the differences among types of treatment for various stages and characteristics of head and neck cancer, and they need to guide and teach patients to weigh the appropriate choices, said Dr. Johnson.

Bruce T. Haughey, MBChBThe major determinants of whether surgery is an effective treatment are histology and stage. If the tumor is low-grade and/or early-stage, surgery alone can be curative.

-Christine Gourin, MD

Oral and Oropharyngeal Cancers

For cancers in the oral cavity, surgery alone may be sufficient treatment and may, in fact, offer the best chance of cure. CRT is not effective as first-line therapy, said Dr. Gourin. But, she added, You have to address the lymph nodes and dissect them during surgery. If there is no evidence of lymph node involvement and if you can achieve clear margins, surgery can be the sum of treatment.

But if, as is common, the cancer has spread to the nodes, you already have stage 3 or maybe stage 4 disease, and then you have to give adjuvant radiation or CRT. For oropharyngeal cancers, if you know beforehand that you’re facing stage 3 or 4 disease, then CRT as primary treatment is appropriate because there’s no getting around the need for radiation therapy. Unlike oral cancer, these tumors tend to be particularly radiosensitive.

In general, though, we try to avoid radiation because it can cause terrible, and permanent, side effects-for example, xerostomia, swallowing problems, and sometimes such severe fibrosis that patients can become feeding tube-dependent. And what’s more, chemotherapy tends to make tissue more radiosensitive, thus exacerbating the effect of radiation.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 | Single Page

Filed Under: Everyday Ethics, Head and Neck Issue: March 2009

You Might Also Like:

  • Is Speech Language Pathologist Evaluation Necessary in the Non-Operative Treatment of Head and Neck Cancer?
  • Most Patients with Early Stage Glottic Carcinoma in National Cancer Database Receive Radiation as First-Line Treatment
  • Chemoradiation vs. Surgery: Which is Better for Head and Neck Cancer?
  • Targeted Therapy a Potential Treatment for Head and Neck Cancer

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

More and more medical trainees are taking dedicated, prolonged gap years. Did you?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Is the SLOR in Otolaryngology Residency Applications Contributing to Rural Disparities?
  • Applications Open for Resident Members of the ENTtoday Editorial Board
  • A Resident’s View of AI in Otolaryngology
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • Resident Pearls: Pediatric Otolaryngologists Share Tips for Safer, Smarter Tonsillectomies
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • Gap Year for Research: Is It Worth It?
    • What Otolaryngologists Can Learn from Athletes
    • Office Laryngoscopy Is Not Aerosol Generating When Evaluated by Optical Particle Sizer
    • What Happens to Medical Students Who Don’t Match?
    • MRI Surveillance Should Extend to 10 Years Post- Op for Vestibular Schwannoma Patients
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?
    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?
    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment
    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name
    • Short-Term Efficacy of Biologics in Recalcitrant AFRS: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    • The Devaluation of Otolaryngology: An Evaluation of CMS’s Involvement in Physician Reimbursement
    • Embolized Middle Meningeal Artery as a Surgical Landmark in Infratemporal Fossa
    • Lord of the (Magnetic) Rings: Rigid Bronchoscopy for Aspirated Magnetic Foreign Bodies in Tertiary Bronchi
    • What Otolaryngologists Can Learn from Athletes

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2026 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939