• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Should Surgery Be First-Line Treatment for Head and Neck Cancer?

by Margot J. Fromer • March 1, 2009

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Surgery provides prognostic information, such as histologic aggression and lymph node involvement, that can guide the decision about adjuvant radiation or CRT.

You Might Also Like

  • Is Speech Language Pathologist Evaluation Necessary in the Non-Operative Treatment of Head and Neck Cancer?
  • Most Patients with Early Stage Glottic Carcinoma in National Cancer Database Receive Radiation as First-Line Treatment
  • Chemoradiation vs. Surgery: Which is Better for Head and Neck Cancer?
  • Targeted Therapy a Potential Treatment for Head and Neck Cancer
Explore This Issue
March 2009

For patients with mouth and throat cancer, many surgeons use the daVinci Surgical System to see if outcomes improve. (daVinci is FDA-approved for surgery on the torso, but not for head and neck procedures.)

Use of the robot reduces trauma, allows for complete tumor removal, and preserves voice and swallowing function. Moreover, the robotic arms are introduced through the mouth, thus obviating the need for incision. It has other advantages as well:

  • Operative time is shorter.
  • Its three arms (cameras and fiberoptic light) provide an advantage over a two-armed human.
  • The robot’s command center contains a three-dimensional computer monitor, thus providing a real but magnified view of the surgical field.
  • The double telescopic endoscope allows a closer view of the surgical site than one could get with unaided vision.
  • Unlike other endoscopic systems, it does not require counterintuitive motions by the surgeon. It translates natural hand movements into the robot’s corresponding micro-movements. Thus, there is less chance for error.
  • The robot’s computer eliminates even the smallest hand tremors.

 

Surgery for Larger Tumors

Dr. Haughey talked about the efficacy of surgery for larger tumors (T3 and T4) of the oral cavity, oropharynx, larynx, and hypopharynx. Ever since a 1991 study of surgery versus CRT, in which the results were equivocal, unfortunately there have been no further trials comparing the two treatment modalities.

Rather, pharmaceutical companies began sponsoring study after study of various oncologic drug cocktails-with and without concurrent radiation. Because there was so much money at stake and because some physicians leapt, lemming-like, over this ‘cliff’ of CRT, surgical treatment was largely ignored in clinical trials as well as the practice patterns of many cancer centers. But slowly, first in Europe and then in this country, with growing enthusiasm and success, surgeons began procedures on larger tumors of the upper aerodigestive tract with minimally invasive approaches.

Laser microsurgery has been a major part of that effort. Although laser endoscopy was developed in the 1970s, only in the last decade have these cost-effective techniques been used for larger tumors, Dr. Haughey said.

He went on to say that transoral laser microsurgery (TLM) can be used even in stage 3 and 4 disease of the larynx and hypopharynx (where the robot cannot yet be used) with excellent oncologic outcome, minimal hospital stay, and low morbidity. Moreover, TLM patients do not usually require a tracheostomy (in open surgery, about 80% of patients do). It is not a simple procedure, however. It requires the right equipment, well trained staff, and pathologists familiar with head and neck anatomy.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 | Single Page

Filed Under: Everyday Ethics, Head and Neck Issue: March 2009

You Might Also Like:

  • Is Speech Language Pathologist Evaluation Necessary in the Non-Operative Treatment of Head and Neck Cancer?
  • Most Patients with Early Stage Glottic Carcinoma in National Cancer Database Receive Radiation as First-Line Treatment
  • Chemoradiation vs. Surgery: Which is Better for Head and Neck Cancer?
  • Targeted Therapy a Potential Treatment for Head and Neck Cancer

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939