• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Sound Quality in CI Users Limited By Pitch Distortion, Dynamic Range Compression

by Samara E. Kuehne • June 20, 2017

  • Tweet
  • Email
Print-Friendly Version

How impaired is sound quality in patients who use cochlear implants (Cis), and what existing measures of sound quality exist?

Bottom line
Physical and electrophysical limitations inherent to CI-mediated listening, in combination with existing studies of CI performance on various auditory tasks, suggest that sound quality perception in the CI population is limited by a range of factors, most notably pitch distortion and dynamic range compression. The study of CI-mediated sound quality requires the development of more objective, systematic, and quantitative measures.

You Might Also Like

  • The Impact of Thyroidectomy on Vocal Quality Characteristics
  • Diagnosis and Treatment of Vocal Problems In Professional Voice Users: Part 2 of 2
  • Neurofibromatosis Patients See Different Benefits from CI and ABI Technology
  • Neurostimulation with Laryngeal Pacemaker Does Not Affect Vocal Quality
Explore This Issue
June 2017
© Elsa Hoffmann / shutterStock.com

© Elsa Hoffmann / shutterStock.com

Background: Despite advances in CI technology, significant perceptual limitations remain, particularly for complex sounds like speech in noise, voice emotion, and music. One major limiting perceptual construct is sound quality. While a number of studies have highlighted diminished sound appraisal in CI users, sound quality perception remains relatively unexplored.

Study design: Literature review.

Synopsis: The authors reviewed the existing literature on PubMed and Scopus to present what is known about perceptual sound quality in CI users, discuss existing measures of sound quality, explore how sound quality may be effectively studied, and examine potential strategies of improving sound quality in the CI population.

Sound quality, defined here as the perceived richness of an auditory stimulus, is an attribute of implant-mediated listening that remains poorly studied. Sound quality is distinct from appraisal, which is generally defined as the subjective likability or pleasantness of a sound. Existing studies suggest that sound quality perception in the CI population is limited by a range of factors, most notably pitch distortion and dynamic range compression.

Although there are currently very few objective measures of sound quality, the CI-MUSHRA has been used as a means of evaluating sound quality. There exist a number of promising strategies to improve sound quality perception in the CI population including apical cochlear stimulation, pitch tuning, and noise reduction processing strategies.

Citation: Caldwell MT, Jiam NT, Limb CJ. Assessment and improvement of sound quality in cochlear implant users. Laryngoscope Inv Oto. Published May 28, 2017. DOI: 101002/lio2.71.

Filed Under: Literature Reviews, Otology/Neurotology Tagged With: CIs, cochlear impants, dynamic range compression, pitch distortion, QualityIssue: June 2017

You Might Also Like:

  • The Impact of Thyroidectomy on Vocal Quality Characteristics
  • Diagnosis and Treatment of Vocal Problems In Professional Voice Users: Part 2 of 2
  • Neurofibromatosis Patients See Different Benefits from CI and ABI Technology
  • Neurostimulation with Laryngeal Pacemaker Does Not Affect Vocal Quality

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Have you invented or patented something that betters the field of otolaryngology?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • The Road Less Traveled—at Least by Otolaryngologists

    • The Best Site for Pediatric TT Placement: OR or Office?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Leaky Pipes—Time to Focus on Our Foundations
    • You Are Among Friends: The Value Of Being In A Group
    • How To: Full Endoscopic Procedures of Total Parotidectomy
    • How To: Does Intralesional Steroid Injection Effectively Mitigate Vocal Fold Scarring in a Rabbit Model?
    • What Is the Optimal Anticoagulation in HGNS Surgery in Patients with High-Risk Cardiac Comorbidities?

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939