• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Standardized Medical Resident Handoffs Could Improve Patient Outcomes

by Vikas Mehta, MD • September 1, 2013

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version


Duty hour hour restrictions were first implemented for resident physicians in 2003. These became more stringent in 2011 as 16-hour work hour limits were put in place for some residents and overnight shifts for interns were banned. Implementation of these restrictions has had conflicting effects on patient safety. One obvious change resulting from work hour limits is the increase in transfers of care between residents, also known as handoffs or sign-outs. In one month, an intern will perform approximately 300 handoffs, an increase of 40 percent since 2003, and an inpatient will be signed out an average of 15 times (J Hosp Med. 2006;1:257-266).

You Might Also Like

  • Work Hour Limits for Medical Residents Spur Otolaryngologists to Rethink Patient Handoffs
  • Empathy Training as a Tool to Improve Medical Outcomes
  • Medical Scribes Can Improve Patient Care, Physician Finances
  • Checklist Improves Communication During Patient Transfers
Explore This Issue
September 2013

Many of the safety benefits seen with the reduction of resident fatigue may be offset by the additional handovers, which are conducted using a highly variable, unsupervised, non-standardized system fraught with communication breakdowns and medical errors. These unstructured sign-outs have led to adverse events, longer hospital stays and unnecessary medical expenses. Currently, 20 percent of malpractice claims against internal medicine residents are the result of miscommunication during patient care transfer (Arch Int Med. 2007;167:2030-2036). One study found that adverse events were strongly associated with coverage by a physician who was not on the patient’s primary team and those risks doubled when the cross-covering physician was an intern (Ann Int Med. 1994;121:866-872). Despite the Joint Commission’s 2009 call for standardization of sign-out communication, handoffs remain unstructured and generally overlooked in residency programs nationwide.

The Current System

In a 2006 survey sent to 324 internal medicine programs, Horwitz and colleagues showed that 55 percent of these programs did not consistently require both a written and an oral sign-out, 34 percent left sign-out to interns alone and 60 percent had no instruction on effective sign-out practices (Arch Int Med. 2006;166:1173-1177). Results also showed that a member of the patient’s primary team was present in the hospital for only 47 percent of the patient’s hospitalization. More recently, a 2011 study in a single institution showed that among 204 observed sign-outs, there were 124 unique versions of the patient handoff (Teach Learn Med. 2011;23:105-111).

Currently, the most common sign-out methods involve the use of spreadsheets or handwritten notes. Wohlauer and colleagues demonstrated that this laborious process required 51 percent of residents to spend one to two hours every day transcribing data and occasionally this resulted in patients being completely missed on rounds (J Surg Res. 2012;172:11-17). With a system that is already subject to staffing stressors due to work hour restrictions, valuable time spent copying results from the EMR is ill advised, inefficient and extremely susceptible to human error.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 | Single Page

Filed Under: Departments, Viewpoint Tagged With: handoffIssue: September 2013

You Might Also Like:

  • Work Hour Limits for Medical Residents Spur Otolaryngologists to Rethink Patient Handoffs
  • Empathy Training as a Tool to Improve Medical Outcomes
  • Medical Scribes Can Improve Patient Care, Physician Finances
  • Checklist Improves Communication During Patient Transfers

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939