ENTtoday
  • Home
  • COVID-19
  • Practice Focus
    • Allergy
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Departments
    • Issue Archive
    • TRIO Best Practices
      • Allergy
      • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
      • Head and Neck
      • Laryngology
      • Otology/Neurotology
      • Pediatric
      • Rhinology
      • Sleep Medicine
    • Career Development
    • Case of the Month
    • Everyday Ethics
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Medical Education
    • Online Exclusives
    • Practice Management
    • Resident Focus
    • Rx: Wellness
    • Special Reports
    • Tech Talk
    • Viewpoint
    • What’s Your O.R. Playlist?
  • Literature Reviews
    • Allergy
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Events
    • Featured Events
    • TRIO Meetings
  • Contact Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Triological Society
    • Advertising Staff
    • Subscribe
  • Advertise
    • Place an Ad
    • Classifieds
    • Rate Card
  • Search

Standardized Medical Resident Handoffs Could Improve Patient Outcomes

by Vikas Mehta, MD • September 1, 2013

  • Tweet
  • Email
Print-Friendly Version


Duty hour hour restrictions were first implemented for resident physicians in 2003. These became more stringent in 2011 as 16-hour work hour limits were put in place for some residents and overnight shifts for interns were banned. Implementation of these restrictions has had conflicting effects on patient safety. One obvious change resulting from work hour limits is the increase in transfers of care between residents, also known as handoffs or sign-outs. In one month, an intern will perform approximately 300 handoffs, an increase of 40 percent since 2003, and an inpatient will be signed out an average of 15 times (J Hosp Med. 2006;1:257-266).

You Might Also Like

No related posts.

Explore This Issue
September 2013

Many of the safety benefits seen with the reduction of resident fatigue may be offset by the additional handovers, which are conducted using a highly variable, unsupervised, non-standardized system fraught with communication breakdowns and medical errors. These unstructured sign-outs have led to adverse events, longer hospital stays and unnecessary medical expenses. Currently, 20 percent of malpractice claims against internal medicine residents are the result of miscommunication during patient care transfer (Arch Int Med. 2007;167:2030-2036). One study found that adverse events were strongly associated with coverage by a physician who was not on the patient’s primary team and those risks doubled when the cross-covering physician was an intern (Ann Int Med. 1994;121:866-872). Despite the Joint Commission’s 2009 call for standardization of sign-out communication, handoffs remain unstructured and generally overlooked in residency programs nationwide.

The Current System

In a 2006 survey sent to 324 internal medicine programs, Horwitz and colleagues showed that 55 percent of these programs did not consistently require both a written and an oral sign-out, 34 percent left sign-out to interns alone and 60 percent had no instruction on effective sign-out practices (Arch Int Med. 2006;166:1173-1177). Results also showed that a member of the patient’s primary team was present in the hospital for only 47 percent of the patient’s hospitalization. More recently, a 2011 study in a single institution showed that among 204 observed sign-outs, there were 124 unique versions of the patient handoff (Teach Learn Med. 2011;23:105-111).

Currently, the most common sign-out methods involve the use of spreadsheets or handwritten notes. Wohlauer and colleagues demonstrated that this laborious process required 51 percent of residents to spend one to two hours every day transcribing data and occasionally this resulted in patients being completely missed on rounds (J Surg Res. 2012;172:11-17). With a system that is already subject to staffing stressors due to work hour restrictions, valuable time spent copying results from the EMR is ill advised, inefficient and extremely susceptible to human error.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 | Single Page

Filed Under: Departments, Viewpoint Tagged With: handoffIssue: September 2013

You Might Also Like:

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

The Laryngoscope
Ensure you have all the latest research at your fingertips; Subscribe to The Laryngoscope today!

Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
Open access journal in otolaryngology – head and neck surgery is currently accepting submissions.

Classifieds

View the classified ads »

TRIO Best Practices

View the TRIO Best Practices »

Top Articles for Residents

  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Why More MDs, Medical Residents Are Choosing to Pursue Additional Academic Degrees
  • What Physicians Need to Know about Investing Before Hiring a Financial Advisor
  • Tips to Help You Regain Your Sense of Self
  • Should USMLE Step 1 Change from Numeric Score to Pass/Fail?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • Vertigo in the Elderly: What Does It Mean?
    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name
    • Neurogenic Cough Is Often a Diagnosis of Exclusion
    • Some Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Resists PPI Treatment
    • Vertigo in the Elderly: What Does It Mean?
    • New Developments in the Management of Eustachian Tube Dysfunction
    • Some Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Resists PPI Treatment
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • Eustachian Tuboplasty: A Potential New Option for Chronic Tube Dysfunction and Patulous Disease
    • FDA Approves First Treatment for Eosinophilic Esophagitis
    • Clinical Best Practices: Otolaryngologists Tackle Questions
    • Otolaryngologist Shares Experience with Image Manipulation in Research and How to Prevent It
    • Methodology to Study Care Barriers for Head and Neck Cancer Patients in Low- and Middle-Income Countries Yields Insights
    • Spreader Graft Placement Found Comparable in Functional Outcome in Patients with Nasal Obstruction

Polls

Do you think most image manipulation in studies is done accidentally or on purpose?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive
  • Home
  • Contact Us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use

Visit: The Triological Society • The Laryngoscope • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology

Wiley
© 2022 The Triological Society. All Rights Reserved.
ISSN 1559-4939