• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Sublingual Immunotherapy (SLIT) Quality of Life Outcomes

by Sue Pondrom • August 1, 2007

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version
Sarah K. Wise, MD

You Might Also Like

  • Sublingual Immunotherapy a Potential Treatment for Allergic Rhinitis
  • SLIT vs SCIT: A Q&A
  • FDA Approves First Sublingual Allergy Immunotherapy Agents
  • Improving Quality of Life for Allergic and Nonallergic Rhinitis Patients
Explore This Issue
August 2007
Sarah K. Wise, MD

SAN DIEGO-Sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) is effective in controlling allergic symptoms in a preliminary patient cohort, according to a study presented April 27 at the Combined Otolaryngology Spring Meeting. Offered as part of the American Rhinologic Society program, the study looked at SLIT as an alternative to traditional subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT), which has resulted in several documented deaths and raised safety concerns.

Presenter Sarah K. Wise, MD, rhinology fellow and clinical instructor at the Medical University of South Carolina in Charleston, told the audience that SLIT is routinely performed in Europe but has not been as popular as SCIT in the United States, in spite of reports of a shorter escalation period, few cases of systemic reactions, and easy administration by patients at home. Although the World Health Organization and the European Academy of Allergology and Clinical Immunology concluded in 1998 that SLIT is a viable alternative to SCIT, it has not yet been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration.

Although worldwide studies have shown decreased allergy symptom scores, reduction in allergy medication use, improved quality of life, decreased bronchodilator use, decreased frequency of asthma exacerbations, and increased FEV1 and peak expiratory flow, US studies assessing the efficacy of SLIT are lacking, Dr. Wise said.

Structure of the Study

In the South Carolina study, patients with seasonal and perennial allergic rhinitis and/or allergic fungal sinusitis (five males and 10 females) with appropriate allergen reactivity on skin testing were given the option to pursue immunotherapy by traditional SCIT or by SLIT. Patients choosing SLIT completed the Mini-Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (mRQLQ), a 14-item forced-choice Likert-type questionnaire, at baseline and during SLIT maintenance therapy. Patients typically reached maintenance therapy in five weeks.

Dr. Wise said that maintenance mRQLQ showed statistically significant improvement in 12 of 14 domains, including impact on regular and recreational activities, sleep, nose rubbing and nose blowing, stuffy nose and runny nose, itchy eyes, sore eyes, watery eyes, thirst, and tiredness. Additionally, total RQLQ score showed statistically significant improvement (p = 0.001) as early as six weeks after initiation of therapy. Baseline total mRQLQ score of 27.8 decreased to 12.6 during maintenance. Maintenance mRQLQ was assessed at a mean of 2.9 months, with a range of five weeks to seven months.

Safety and Efficacy

One of the biggest arguments for SLIT is its safety profile, Dr. Wise told COSM participants, noting few reports of systemic reactions, as compared to SCIT systemic reaction rates of 0.5% to 5.6%. The typical side effects of SLIT, she said, are oral itching, stomachache, and nausea, with very rare withdrawal rates from SLIT studies for adverse reactions.

Pages: 1 2 | Single Page

Filed Under: Everyday Ethics, Head and Neck, Laryngology Issue: August 2007

You Might Also Like:

  • Sublingual Immunotherapy a Potential Treatment for Allergic Rhinitis
  • SLIT vs SCIT: A Q&A
  • FDA Approves First Sublingual Allergy Immunotherapy Agents
  • Improving Quality of Life for Allergic and Nonallergic Rhinitis Patients

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939