• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Targeted Therapies + Chemo Show Activity in Recurrent/Metastatic Head And Neck Cancer

by Mark Fuerst • February 1, 2008

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

The targeted therapies erlotinib and cetuximab, in combination with standard chemotherapy regimens, are well tolerated and have very encouraging activity in recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, according to two presentations at the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) 2007 Annual Meeting in Chicago.

You Might Also Like

  • Targeted Therapy a Potential Treatment for Head and Neck Cancer
  • PET Not Ready for Routine Management of Head and Neck Cancer
  • Management Issues in Recurrent and Metastatic Thyroid Cancer
  • New Treatment for Head and Neck Cancer Means Longer-Lasting Toxicity
Explore This Issue
February 2008

Interrupting the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) signaling pathway has shown promise in a variety of cancers, and preclinical data have demonstrated possible synergy with platinums and taxanes, said Edward S. Kim, MD, Assistant Professor of Thoracic/Head and Neck Medical Oncology at the University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center in Houston. Treatment options for recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma are limited.

An M. D. Anderson study of cisplatin and docetaxel showed a response rate of 40% and median survival of 9.6 months. Erlotinib, an EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor, had a 4.3% response rate as a single agent in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Because of the possible synergy and efficacy, we proposed to study the combination of cisplatin, docetaxel, and erlotinib in advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, Dr. Kim said.

In this open-label, Phase II trial, patients were required to have adequate performance status, measurable disease, and no prior EGFR therapy, and may have received prior induction, concomitant, or adjuvant chemotherapy, but not for recurrent/metastatic disease. Sites of disease included squamous cell head and neck sites excluding nasopharynx.

Treatment included docetaxel at 75 mg/m2 and cisplatin at 75 mg/m2, given intravenously every three weeks for up to six cycles and erlotinib at 150 mg, given orally, daily until progression. All agents were started on the first day, and patients were treated with growth factor support.

The trial has completed accrual of 50 patients, and 47 patients, median age of 57, were available for analysis. The majority had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 1 (41 patients). Most patients (63%) had locoregional disease. The patients were predominantly smokers, with more than 75% being current or former smokers.

Prior therapy included radiation alone in four patients, surgery and radiation in 20, chemotherapy and radiation in five, and chemotherapy, radiation, and surgery in 13 patients. Six patients were untreated.

Complete responses have been observed in four patients (8%), partial responses in 28 patients (58%), and 13 patients (25%) have stable disease, for an overall response rate of 66% and a disease control rate of 91%. Only three patients had disease progression after two cycles of treatment.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 | Single Page

Filed Under: Departments, Head and Neck, Medical Education, Practice Focus Tagged With: cancer, carcinoma, outcomes, radiation, research, treatmentIssue: February 2008

You Might Also Like:

  • Targeted Therapy a Potential Treatment for Head and Neck Cancer
  • PET Not Ready for Routine Management of Head and Neck Cancer
  • Management Issues in Recurrent and Metastatic Thyroid Cancer
  • New Treatment for Head and Neck Cancer Means Longer-Lasting Toxicity

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939