• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

The Tax Bill’s Implications for Healthcare

by Steven M. Harris, Esq. • February 1, 2018

  • Tweet
  • Email
Print-Friendly Version

On December 20, 2017, Congress passed a massive tax bill, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, that will impact nearly every individual and business in America. While the bill makes sweeping revisions to existing tax provisions, it will also largely impact the health industry.

You Might Also Like

  • How the Tax Bill Will Impact Your Practice
  • Health Reform Perks: Employer tax credits could benefit your practice
  • Affordable Care Act Latest in Half-Century of Healthcare Reform
  • New Excise Tax Applicable to Otolaryngologist Devices

Individual Mandate Repealed

The bill repeals the individual mandate established in 2005 by the Affordable Care Act (ACA) by eliminating the penalty for failure to maintain health insurance coverage.

Under the ACA, the individual mandate requires Americans to carry a minimum level of health coverage unless they qualify for a hardship exemption. Failure to maintain coverage would result in a monetary penalty. The purpose of this mandate was to widen the insurance pools to establish a more representative class of insured, which includes young, old, healthy, and sick individuals. Widening the pool was intended to reduce premiums through the idea that more people would be paying for coverage (instead of people enrolling only due to an illness and cancelling coverage once it was no longer needed), thereby reducing the overall cost of insurance.

It is anticipated that repealing the individual mandate will not affect most Americans because the majority of the population receives coverage through their employers or through a government program such as Medicare, Medicaid, Tricare, or CHAMPUS; however, those individuals who obtain coverage through private insurance markets will likely face higher premiums as a result of the repeal. Experts project that these higher premiums will destabilize the individual market and cause the number of uninsured Americans to rise.

The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) stated that approximately four million fewer people will have health insurance coverage in the first year that the repeal is effective. This number is projected to rise to 13 million by 2027. In addition to the rising number of uninsured individuals, the CBO expects premiums to rise approximately 10% each year of the first decade of the repeal.

As a result, some insurers will likely drop out of the market. Industry and consumer groups have expressed their concerns regarding the repeal. The American Academy of Actuaries called [PDF] the mandate an “integral component” of the ACA because it “helps encourage the young and healthy, as well as the old and sick, to obtain coverage, thus achieving the balanced risk pool required to keep premiums affordable and stable.” As a result, “insurers would likely reconsider their future participation in the market. This could lead to severe market disruption and loss of coverage among individual market enrollees.”

Impact on Providers

Providers will certainly be negatively impacted by the mandate’s repeal. When individuals opt out of insurance coverage, they will be less inclined to seek medical assistance when needed. This reduction in office visits will directly affect provider income, because there will be fewer encounters resulting in reimbursable claims. It is worth noting, however, that those individuals who opt out of insurance coverage are likely to be those who do not have an urgent need for healthcare. If this is the case, provider reimbursement may not be impacted too drastically, as many of the soon-to-be uninsured individuals would likely not be visiting medical professionals frequently due to the fact that they are generally in good health.

Pages: 1 2 | Single Page

Filed Under: Online Exclusives Tagged With: legislation, policy

You Might Also Like:

  • How the Tax Bill Will Impact Your Practice
  • Health Reform Perks: Employer tax credits could benefit your practice
  • Affordable Care Act Latest in Half-Century of Healthcare Reform
  • New Excise Tax Applicable to Otolaryngologist Devices

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Have you invented or patented something that betters the field of otolaryngology?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • The Road Less Traveled—at Least by Otolaryngologists

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Best Site for Pediatric TT Placement: OR or Office?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Leaky Pipes—Time to Focus on Our Foundations
    • You Are Among Friends: The Value Of Being In A Group
    • How To: Full Endoscopic Procedures of Total Parotidectomy
    • How To: Does Intralesional Steroid Injection Effectively Mitigate Vocal Fold Scarring in a Rabbit Model?
    • What Is the Optimal Anticoagulation in HGNS Surgery in Patients with High-Risk Cardiac Comorbidities?

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939