• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Treatment Success Poor for Age-Related Vocal Fold Atrophy

by Sue Pondrom • February 28, 2011

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

What is the perceived treatment success for patients with vocal fold atrophy?

You Might Also Like

  • Injection Laryngoplasty Helps in Recovery of Vocal Fold Motion
  • Vocal Fold Fat Augmentation Is a Durable Treatment Option for Patients with Glottic Insufficiency
  • Laryngeal EMG Is Best Technique to Differentiate Arytenoid Dislocation from Unilateral Vocal Fold Paralysis
  • Patient Etiologies and Treatment Outcomes for Dysphonia Differ Between Key Age Groups
Explore This Issue
March 2011

Background: Estimates for the number of elderly people with voice problems range from 4 percent to 30 percent. There are only a few published studies on voice therapy for age-related vocal fold atrophy and treatment outcomes of voice therapy and injection augmentation intervention. Additionally, it is unknown if improvements transferred to conversational speech as well as to the patients’ self-perception of their voice disorders.

Study design: Retrospective study.

Setting: University of Pittsburgh Voice Center, Department of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh.

Synopsis: Researchers reviewed 275 patients with vocal fold atrophy from January 2007 through January 2009 and used 29 percent as their estimate of the total population age 65 and older with dysphonia. They noted that only 15 percent to 20 percent of patients seek treatment. Therapy outcome measures used were pre/post-treatment Voice Handicap Index-10 and data from a voice therapy discharge survey. The treatment success for these patients was low (17 percent to 56 percent), and more than two-thirds of the cohort did not return for any treatment. More than half of the patients who only had surgery were judged to have improved. Many patients seemed unhappy with their treatment outcomes after voice therapy and/or surgery, however. The authors said a decrease in memory may cause increased patient frustration with therapy. They suggested pre-operative counseling to establish appropriate expectations.

Bottom line: Neither voice therapy nor surgery should be considered a certainty in helping patients with age-related vocal fold atrophy, and professionals should help patients with treatment expectations.

Citation: Gartner-Schmidt J, Rosen C. Treatment success for age-related vocal fold atrophy. Laryngoscope. 2011;121(3):585-589.

—Reviewed by Sue Pondrom

Filed Under: Clinical, Laryngology, Literature Reviews Tagged With: clinical, treatment, vocal fold atrophyIssue: March 2011

You Might Also Like:

  • Injection Laryngoplasty Helps in Recovery of Vocal Fold Motion
  • Vocal Fold Fat Augmentation Is a Durable Treatment Option for Patients with Glottic Insufficiency
  • Laryngeal EMG Is Best Technique to Differentiate Arytenoid Dislocation from Unilateral Vocal Fold Paralysis
  • Patient Etiologies and Treatment Outcomes for Dysphonia Differ Between Key Age Groups

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Have you experienced an increase in in-office rhinology procedures in the last year?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • A Letter to My Younger Self: Making Deliberate Changes Can Help Improve the Sense of Belonging
  • ENTtoday Welcomes Resident Editorial Board Members
  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • Empty Nose Syndrome: Physiological, Psychological, or Perhaps a Little of Both?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • History of the Cochlear Implant

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Keeping Watch for Skin Cancers on the Head and Neck

    • Questions on NIH Funding Leave ENT Researchers Pondering Next Steps and Leaving Everything Up in the Air
    • In-Office Rhinology Practices Continue to Grow
    • How Do We Define “Winning” in the OR?
    • A Letter to My Younger Self: Making Deliberate Changes Can Help Improve the Sense of Belonging
    • How To: Superior Maximization of Sphenoidotomy with Olfaction Preservation in Endoscopic Endonasal Surgery

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939