• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Technology
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
    • SUO Corner
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Technology
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
    • SUO Corner
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Vocal Fold Fat Augmentation Is a Durable Treatment Option for Patients with Glottic Insufficiency

by Linda Kossoff • July 20, 2021

  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

What are the long-term outcomes for vocal fold fat augmentation using strict harvesting, preparing, and implantation protocols?

BOTTOM LINE

You Might Also Like

  • Vocal Fold Augmentation Improves Dyspnea Symptoms for Glottic Insufficiency
  • Vocal Fold Lipoaugmentation Provides Long-Term Voice Improvements for Glottal Insufficiency
  • Otolaryngologists Vary Significantly in Choice of Injectable Materials for Vocal Fold Injection Augmentation
  • Glottic Gap Area Not Correlated with Vocal Function in Presbyphonia Patients
Explore This Issue
July 2021

Fat is an excellent source for autologous grafts and, with careful patient selection and proper surgical technique, is suitable for long-term correction of glottic insufficiency.

BACKGROUND: Glottal insufficiency results in voice and swallowing dysfunction. Medialization or augmentation can improve glottal closure and reduce air leak. Medialization by injection augmentation can be achieved through use of synthetic and biologically derived materials, which absorb with time, or autologous grafts, including fat. There has been debate regarding the durability of fat implants.

Comment: The article shows excellent long-term follow-up on a series of vocal cord fat injections, showing that the fat graft material is quite long lasting for most patients. This would help remind practitioners of this very useful technique and reinforce its inclusion in treatment algorithms for vocal cord paralysis, atrophy, and scar. —Jonathan Bock, MD

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort study.

SETTING: Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Kaplan Medical Center, Rehovot, Israel.

SYNOPSIS: For their study, researchers enrolled 22 patients (six women, 16 men, mean age 48.3 years) with glottic sufficiency, 11 of whom had unilateral vocal fold paralysis (UVFP), and 11 of whom had atrophy or scar. All of the patients were injected, unilaterally or bilaterally, with harvested fat into multiple sites, and were injected into the paraglottic space, deep to the ligament. Outcome measurements included video stroboscopy; grade, roughness, breathiness, asthenia, strain (GRBAS) score; voice handicap index (VHI); and acoustic analysis, performed preoperatively and then three, 12, 24, and 36 months after surgery. Comparing the preoperative and 36-month postoperative periods, the mean GRBAS decreased from 8.64 to 2.82, and the mean VHI score improved from 73.45 to 44.88. Stroboscopic analysis revealed statistically significant improvement in mucosal wave propagation, phase closure, and phase symmetry. Best results were achieved in the UVFP subgroup. Computed tomography scans demonstrated long-term viability of the implanted adipose tissue. Researchers state that these findings confirmed their hypothesis regarding the durability of fat augmentation as compared to other injectable materials as a long-term treatment for glottic insufficiency. Study limitations included the relatively small size and heterogenic etiologies of the study population.

CITATION: Lahav Y, Malka-Yosef L, Shapira-Galitz Y, et al. Vocal fold fat augmentation for atrophy, scarring, and unilateral paralysis: long-term functional outcomes. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2021;164:631-638.

Filed Under: Laryngology, Laryngology, Literature Reviews Tagged With: glottic insufficiency, treatmentIssue: July 2021

You Might Also Like:

  • Vocal Fold Augmentation Improves Dyspnea Symptoms for Glottic Insufficiency
  • Vocal Fold Lipoaugmentation Provides Long-Term Voice Improvements for Glottal Insufficiency
  • Otolaryngologists Vary Significantly in Choice of Injectable Materials for Vocal Fold Injection Augmentation
  • Glottic Gap Area Not Correlated with Vocal Function in Presbyphonia Patients

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Have you ever encountered a mentally or physically threatening patient or caregiver?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Is the SLOR in Otolaryngology Residency Applications Contributing to Rural Disparities?
  • Applications Open for Resident Members of the ENTtoday Editorial Board
  • A Resident’s View of AI in Otolaryngology
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • Resident Pearls: Pediatric Otolaryngologists Share Tips for Safer, Smarter Tonsillectomies
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • Office Laryngoscopy Is Not Aerosol Generating When Evaluated by Optical Particle Sizer
    • Some Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Resists PPI Treatment
    • Top 10 LARY and LIO Articles of 2024
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • Is Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Effective for Tinnitus?
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?
    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?
    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment
    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name
    • The Pursuit of Excellence—the Journey or the Gold
    • Is There Benefit of Music Training Following Cochlear Implantation?
    • Is Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Effective for Tinnitus?
    • Does Dupilumab Improve Sinonasal Outcomes in AERD Patients?
    • Making the Most of TRIO Meetings

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2026 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939