• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Triptans Prove Helpful in Treating ‘Sinus Headaches

by Ed Susman • June 1, 2008

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Dr. Kari is absolutely correct in her findings, he said.

You Might Also Like

  • FDA Advisory on Triptans and SSRI/SNRIs Will Not Affect Migraine Treatment, Say Experts
  • Wrong Diagnosis of Sinus Headache Can Lead to Inappropriate Treatment
  • Targeting Headaches: Trigger release surgery an option for patients with chronic migraine
  • Nonstandard Thinking Required to Meet the Challenge of Complex Sinus Conditions
Explore This Issue
June 2008
Figure. In a study, triptans brought relief to more than 80% of people diagnosed with 'sinus headaches.'

click for large version
Figure. In a study, triptans brought relief to more than 80% of people diagnosed with ‘sinus headaches.’

In presentation of her prospective trial results, Dr. Kari noted that sinus headache is a common diagnosis given to the patient with facial pressure or pain. However, she added that sinus headache appears to be overdiagnosed and overtreated, and that it is a common chief complaint in otolaryngology and often involves surgical intervention.

Dr. Kari said that the Rhinosinusitis Task Force of the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery includes facial pain or pressure as a major diagnostic symptom of sinusitis when present in conjunction with one of the other major symptoms, such nasal obstruction, nasal discharge, hyposmia or anosmia, or fever in acute rhinosinusitis. Minor factors include headache, halitosis, dental pain, cough, and facial fullness or pressure.

The International Headache Society defines migraine as two attacks fulfilling the following criteria if aura is present:

  • A headache that lasts four to 72 hours;
  • Headaches that have two or more of the following factors: unilateral, pulsating, moderate-severe intensity, aggravated by or causing avoidance of routine physical activity;
  • One of the following occurs during headache: nausea, vomiting, photophobia, or phonophobia; and
  • Headache cannot be attributed to another disorder.

Dr. Kari said that their results suggest that an empiric use of triptans in CT-negative patients might lead to relief of pain-indicating that the original diagnosis of sinus headache is incorrect, in fact, and migraine headache is the correct diagnosis.

Structure of the Study

Drs. Kari and DelGaudio enrolled 55 patients in their study, but only two-thirds completed the treatment. There were 37 women and 18 men in the study, reflecting the natural preponderance of migraine among women. The patients’ median age was 39. Patients were instructed to treat every headache.

Patients were followed up within one to three months, at which time they returned the headache diaries logging response to triptan therapy to each headache.

I need to emphasize that we had a highly selected study population, Dr. Kari said. In fact, 73% of the patients enrolled met International Headache Society criteria for migraine. Of those 41 patients, 31 met criteria for migraine but had not been previously diagnosed with migraine.

About 82 percent of the patients in our study had a significant reduction in headache with triptan use, she said. However, she did note significant attrition, as nearly a third of enrolled patients did not follow up. Many of the patients did not follow up because there was a significant resistance to believing a diagnosis of migraine headache. Many people consider migraine headaches only in the setting of a debilitating headache, which many of these patients did not have. Also, these patients have been treated for years by other physicians for presumed sinus headaches, and they were unwilling to believe that all of these previous diagnoses were incorrect, she said.

Pages: 1 2 3 | Single Page

Filed Under: Departments, Head and Neck, Medical Education, Practice Focus Tagged With: COSM, CT, diagnosis, medication, outcomes, research, sinus headache, Sinusitis, treatmentIssue: June 2008

You Might Also Like:

  • FDA Advisory on Triptans and SSRI/SNRIs Will Not Affect Migraine Treatment, Say Experts
  • Wrong Diagnosis of Sinus Headache Can Lead to Inappropriate Treatment
  • Targeting Headaches: Trigger release surgery an option for patients with chronic migraine
  • Nonstandard Thinking Required to Meet the Challenge of Complex Sinus Conditions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939