• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Uncommon Surgical Technique Can Preserve Function after Throat Cancer Surgery

by Alice Goodman • June 1, 2006

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Supracricoid Partial Laryngectomy Should Be One Treatment of Choice for Intermediate to Advanced Laryngeal Cancer

You Might Also Like

  • A Swing of the Pendulum?
  • Chemoradiation vs. Surgery: Which is Better for Head and Neck Cancer?
  • Targeted Therapy a Potential Treatment for Head and Neck Cancer
  • Chemotherapy Alone Not Recommended for Advanced Laryngeal or Hypopharyngeal Cancer
Explore This Issue
June 2006

Supracricoid partial laryngectomy (SCPL) should be considered as an important option for the treatment of selected intermediate to advanced laryngeal cancers because it can preserve functionality of the larynx, according to expert surgeons interviewed for this article. SCPL, developed as an alternative to total laryngectomy for selected glottic and supraglottic carcinomas, typically preserves a patient’s ability to speak and swallow while at the same time assuring a high rate of local control of cancer.

Slow to Catch On

Despite the advantages of SCPL, a confluence of factors has kept this procedure from enjoying more widespread use in the United States.

“SCPL avoids total removal of the voice box and is a particular advance for the surgical management of selected intermediate and advanced as well as some recurrent cancers of the larynx,” stated Gregory S. Weinstein, MD, Professor and Vice Chair of the Department of Otorhinolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery at the University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia.

“SCPL avoids total removal of the voice box and is a particular advance for the surgical management of selected intermediate and advanced as well as some recurrent cancers of the larynx.” – Gregory S. Weinstein, MD

Dr. Weinstein helped introduce the technique in the United States and has written widely about his experience with SCPL. He explained that SCPL “passes the test” of saving the voice box and preserving the patient’s ability to speak and eat without a permanent tracheostomy or gastrostomy tube two years after the procedure—the point when no local recurrence is expected. Dr. Weinstein stated that he has colleagues that can perform SCPL who are within driving distance of any patient in the United States.

“SCPL is a remarkable, unprecedented advance as a surgical option for intermediate to advanced laryngeal cancers. Despite the opportunity for using this technique, it is not as widely implemented as it should be,” explained Chris Holsinger, MD, Assistant Professor at M.D. Anderson Cancer Center in Houston, Tex., a surgeon experienced with the technique and author of several articles about SCPL.

Development of SCPL

In 1959, two surgeons working in Vienna proposed the idea of removing most of the larynx and attaching the hyoid bone (tongue base) to the cricoid cartilage, Dr. Holsinger explained. The technique was published in French and was greeted with enthusiasm in Paris. Over the next 20 years, three French surgeons—Laccoureye, Labayle, and Piquet—improved on the technique. These surgeons published papers in the early 1970s that advanced the technique and refined patient selection, Dr. Holsinger continued.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 | Single Page

Filed Under: Departments, Head and Neck, Laryngology, Medical Education, Practice Focus Tagged With: cancer, carcinoma, laryngectomy, outcomes, radiation, research, surgery, techniques, treatment, voiceIssue: June 2006

You Might Also Like:

  • A Swing of the Pendulum?
  • Chemoradiation vs. Surgery: Which is Better for Head and Neck Cancer?
  • Targeted Therapy a Potential Treatment for Head and Neck Cancer
  • Chemotherapy Alone Not Recommended for Advanced Laryngeal or Hypopharyngeal Cancer

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939