• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Uncommon Surgical Technique Can Preserve Function after Throat Cancer Surgery

by Alice Goodman • June 1, 2006

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Contraindications include (1) massive invasion of the preepiglottic space, because involvement of the hyoid bone would preclude preservation of this structure; (2) involvement of the pharynx or interarytenoid area; (3) cricoid cartilage invasion and infraglottic extension of the tumor reaching the cricoid; (4) arytenoid cartilage fixation; and (5) respiratory impairment (such as severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease).

You Might Also Like

  • A Swing of the Pendulum?
  • Chemoradiation vs. Surgery: Which is Better for Head and Neck Cancer?
  • Targeted Therapy a Potential Treatment for Head and Neck Cancer
  • Chemotherapy Alone Not Recommended for Advanced Laryngeal or Hypopharyngeal Cancer
Explore This Issue
June 2006

“As a more vocal group of surgeons has advocated for SCPL, surgery may find a greater role in primary treatment of intermediate-stage laryngeal cancer and certainly for selected radiation failures.” – Erich Sturgis, MD

For SCPL with CHEP, Dr. Weinstein said that indications include selected lesions with: (1) bilateral cord involvement (i.e., horseshoe lesions); (2) impaired true vocal cord mobility with limited subglottic and ventricular extension; or (3) true vocal cord fixation without arytenoid fixation.

Contraindications for SCPL with CHEP include: (1) preepiglottic space invasion (utilize SCPL with CHP in this case); (2) cricoid cartilage invasion or infraglottic invasion reaching the cricoid cartilage; (3) arytenoid cartilage fixation; or (4) respiratory impairment.

SCPL, though, is not possible in patients with cricoarytenoid joint fixation and those with spread of cancer between the arytenoids cartilages, to tongue base above, or far below the vocal cords, Dr. Holsinger commented.

A recent publication by Dr. Weinstein’s group at University of Pennsylvania suggests that SCPL can be safely performed in selected cancers with subglottic extension of 15 mm or less and without arytenoids fixation (Laryngoscope 2005;115:297–300). The surgery was found to achieve oncologically safe organ preservation in glottic cancers that extended beyond the traditionally accepted subglottic limit of 10 mm, Dr. Weinstein explained.

Which Procedure is Best?

At present, it is not clear which procedure provides the best functional outcomes in intermediate to advanced laryngeal cancer—chemotherapy and radiation, SCPL using CHEP or CHP, or laser surgery, which has gained popularity. Dr. Holsinger noted that laser surgery, removing laryngeal structures through the mouth, necessitates dividing the tumor in half, “and this violates Halsted’s classically accepted oncologic principles.”

“The choice between chemotherapy and radiation versus SCPL is up in the air. For diffuse tumors, SCPL is not optimal, but many patients who could benefit from SCPL are currently treated with chemotherapy and radiotherapy,” Dr. Holsinger said.

“Unfortunately, as surgeons, we don’t have level —A’ evidence-based medicine studies that support this approach, such as a randomized prospective trial—despite strong support for SCPL among otolaryngologists,” Dr. Holsinger said.

More well-designed scientific studies are needed to explore which patients should receive chemotherapy and radiotherapy versus SCPL. Dr. Sturgis said that academic centers like M.D. Anderson use a multidisciplinary approach with group decision-making to determine treatment recommendations. “As this multidisciplinary approach has gained acceptance in much of the US, radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy became the standard for intermediate-stage laryngeal cancers. However, as a more vocal group of surgeons has advocated for SCPL, surgery may find a greater role in primary treatment of intermediate-stage laryngeal cancer and certainly for selected radiation failures,” Dr. Sturgis commented.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 | Single Page

Filed Under: Departments, Head and Neck, Laryngology, Medical Education, Practice Focus Tagged With: cancer, carcinoma, laryngectomy, outcomes, radiation, research, surgery, techniques, treatment, voiceIssue: June 2006

You Might Also Like:

  • A Swing of the Pendulum?
  • Chemoradiation vs. Surgery: Which is Better for Head and Neck Cancer?
  • Targeted Therapy a Potential Treatment for Head and Neck Cancer
  • Chemotherapy Alone Not Recommended for Advanced Laryngeal or Hypopharyngeal Cancer

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939