• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

What Is the Role of PET-CT in Residual Occult Nodal Disease?

by Pippa Wysong • September 1, 2009

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Among the 14 patients who had positive PET-CT findings but no tumor, it was found that five patients had extensive necrosis, and either a histiocytic response or foreign body giant cell reaction was found in nine patients. Of the eight patients in whom PET-CT and pathology studies were both negative for tumors, three patients were found to have radiation fibrosis, and five had a foreign body reaction with giant cells and cholesterol debris.

You Might Also Like

  • PET-Directed Management of Node-Positive Head and Neck Cancers
  • PET Not Ready for Routine Management of Head and Neck Cancer
  • Treatment Options: Study reports neck dissection effective in patients with residual disease
  • PET-CT is Cost-Effective for N2 Disease After Chemoradiotherapy
Explore This Issue
September 2009

Overall, the sensitivity and specificity of PET-CT in predicting occult nodal disease was 60% and 36% respectively, Dr. Gourin said, with a positive predictive value of 30%, and a negative predictive value of 67%. PET-CT performed within three months of treatment did not correlate with pathologic findings.

Researchers also took into account the standard uptake value (SUV) of PET and how this may have related to findings. SUV levels show how active cells are in terms of utilizing the FDG contrast material; however, both nonviable tumor cells and areas where inflammation is occurring show increased SUV, which can increase the false positives from PET imaging when PET-CT is performed too early, she said.

Christine Gourin, MDThe efficacy of PET-CT in predicting residual nodal disease after chemoradiation, and thus the need for posttreatment neck dissection, appears dependent on the timing of imaging after chemoradiation.
-Christine Gourin, MD

Timing of PET-CT Also a Factor

Whether post-treatment neck dissection should be used in HNSCC with advanced disease is controversial because not all patients have residual occult disease. But if surgery is to be performed after chemoradiation, evidence suggests that the safest window is four to 12 weeks after chemoradiation. Unfortunately, this window corresponds to a time when PET-CT has a lower accuracy-studies show that performing the imaging later, at about 12 weeks after inflammation has been reduced and there may be an increase in tumor size, is associated with greater accuracy, she said.

Deferring early post-treatment neck dissection in patients without residual adenopathy in favor of obtaining PET-CT imaging in 12 weeks, or later, following chemoradiation may be a viable approach to help reduce the number of unnecessary neck dissections, Dr. Gourin said.

The regional recurrence rate after planned neck dissection was 6%, which is similar to rates reported for patients with a complete response who are observed with serial negative PET-CT imaging. Overall, our data suggest that not all residual viable tumors in post-treatment neck dissections are viable and that the timing of PET-CT should influence the decision to proceed with neck dissection, not the other way around, she said.

Another Opinion

Another take on the subject came from Cherie Ryoo, MD, a fourth-year resident in otolaryngology-head and neck surgery at Ohio State University, who presented findings from a retrospective study of 243 head and neck cancer patients who had a diagnosis of upper aerodigestive tract squamous cell cancer. Data were collected for patients who were treated from January 2005 to December 2007.

Pages: 1 2 3 | Single Page

Filed Under: Everyday Ethics, Head and Neck Tagged With: COSM, head and neck cancer, HNSCC, neck dissection, patient safety, PET, PET-CTIssue: September 2009

You Might Also Like:

  • PET-Directed Management of Node-Positive Head and Neck Cancers
  • PET Not Ready for Routine Management of Head and Neck Cancer
  • Treatment Options: Study reports neck dissection effective in patients with residual disease
  • PET-CT is Cost-Effective for N2 Disease After Chemoradiotherapy

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939