ENTtoday
  • Home
  • COVID-19
  • Practice Focus
    • Allergy
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Departments
    • Issue Archive
    • TRIO Best Practices
      • Allergy
      • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
      • Head and Neck
      • Laryngology
      • Otology/Neurotology
      • Pediatric
      • Rhinology
      • Sleep Medicine
    • Career Development
    • Case of the Month
    • Everyday Ethics
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Medical Education
    • Online Exclusives
    • Practice Management
    • Resident Focus
    • Rx: Wellness
    • Special Reports
    • Tech Talk
    • Viewpoint
    • What’s Your O.R. Playlist?
  • Literature Reviews
    • Allergy
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Events
    • Featured Events
    • TRIO Meetings
  • Contact Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Triological Society
    • Advertising Staff
    • Subscribe
  • Advertise
    • Place an Ad
    • Classifieds
    • Rate Card
  • Search

PET-CT is Cost-Effective for N2 Disease After Chemoradiotherapy

by Sue Pondrom • September 17, 2014

  • Tweet
  • Email
Print-Friendly Version

Clinical Question: Is positron emission tomography-computerized tomography (PET-CT) scanning cost-effective for the management of the neck after chemoradiotherapy (CRT)?

Background: About 70 percent of neck dissection specimens have no pathologic disease. While PET imaging is highly expensive, it is used extensively for post-treatment surveillance, even though the utility of this usage has not been well studied. Additionally, insurance providers are reluctant to reimburse protocols that require serial PET-CT imaging in today’s current healthcare climate.

You Might Also Like

No related posts.

Explore This Issue
February 2012

Study design: Hypothetical patient case study and literature review.

Setting: Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans; and Department of Otolaryngology and Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Penn.

Synopsis: The authors conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis comparing up-front neck dissection to serial PET-CT in a hypothetical clinical scenario involving a patient with oropharyngeal cancer with pre-treatment N2 disease and having a complete response. Additionally, a literature review was performed to obtain information on incidence, probabilities and range for various clinical events in the algorithm. The team found that the PET-CT strategy would cost an average of $14,492 per patient, while neck dissection had a 0.6% percent greater efficacy in controlling neck disease, with a $22,433 incremental cost. One limitation to the study was the narrow applicability to those patients with characteristics similar to the hypothetical clinical scenario, which includes a limited follow-up period of one year.

Bottom line: The use of PET-CT imaging is the more cost-effective strategy, compared with up-front neck dissection, for surveillance of the patient with pre-treatment N2 disease, a controlled primary tumor and a clinically negative neck after completion of definitive CRT.

Reference: Rabalais A, Walvekar RR, Johnson JT, et al. A cost-effectiveness analysis of positron emission tomography-computed tomography surveillance versus up-front neck dissection for management of the neck for N2 disease after chemoradiotherapy. Laryngoscope. 2012;122(2):311-314.

Filed Under: Head and Neck, Head and Neck, Literature Reviews, Practice Focus Issue: February 2012

You Might Also Like:

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

The Laryngoscope
Ensure you have all the latest research at your fingertips; Subscribe to The Laryngoscope today!

Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
Open access journal in otolaryngology – head and neck surgery is currently accepting submissions.

Classifieds

View the classified ads »

TRIO Best Practices

View the TRIO Best Practices »

Top Articles for Residents

  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Why More MDs, Medical Residents Are Choosing to Pursue Additional Academic Degrees
  • What Physicians Need to Know about Investing Before Hiring a Financial Advisor
  • Tips to Help You Regain Your Sense of Self
  • Should USMLE Step 1 Change from Numeric Score to Pass/Fail?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • Vertigo in the Elderly: What Does It Mean?
    • Some Studies Predict a Shortage of Otolaryngologists. Do the Numbers Support Them?
    • Neurogenic Cough Is Often a Diagnosis of Exclusion
    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name
    • Vertigo in the Elderly: What Does It Mean?
    • New Developments in the Management of Eustachian Tube Dysfunction
    • Some Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Resists PPI Treatment
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • Eustachian Tuboplasty: A Potential New Option for Chronic Tube Dysfunction and Patulous Disease
    • Tympanoplasty Tips: Otology Experts Give Advice on the Procedure
    • How Treatment for Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) Is Evolving to Give Patients a Better Night’s Sleep
    • Vestibular Schwannoma Position Relative to Internal Auditory Canal Helps Predict Postoperative Facial Function
    • Vocal Fold Lipoaugmentation Provides Long-Term Voice Improvements for Glottal Insufficiency
    • Upper Lateral Cartilage Mucosal Flap Enables the Successful Closure of Larger Septal Perforations

Polls

Do you think there will be a shortage of otolaryngologists in the next five to 10 years?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive
  • Home
  • Contact Us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use

Visit: The Triological Society • The Laryngoscope • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology

Wiley
© 2022 The Triological Society. All Rights Reserved.
ISSN 1559-4939

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.