• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

What Is the Role of PET-CT in Residual Occult Nodal Disease?

by Pippa Wysong • September 1, 2009

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Criteria for patients included a neck dissection as part of their treatment, and a whole-body PET-CT performed prior to treatment. The researchers used an SUV value of 2.5 as a standard for positive findings, and compared this to data on histopathological findings.

You Might Also Like

  • PET-Directed Management of Node-Positive Head and Neck Cancers
  • PET Not Ready for Routine Management of Head and Neck Cancer
  • Treatment Options: Study reports neck dissection effective in patients with residual disease
  • PET-CT is Cost-Effective for N2 Disease After Chemoradiotherapy
Explore This Issue
September 2009

The researchers found that in the end, in the group of subjects with N0 necks, there were 26 true positives and 80 true negatives. If we based our decision to perform a neck dissection solely off the findings of the PET-CT, we would have performed 18 unnecessary dissections and missed 20 positive specimens. For comparison, there were the patients that had an end-positive neck-these would have resulted in six unnecessary dissections and 10 missed positive specimens, she said. PET-CTs were done prior to treatment.

Dr. Ryoo concluded that PET-CT does not currently have the capability of replacing neck dissection as a staging tool. The technology has room for improvement.

©2009 The Triological Society

Pages: 1 2 3 | Single Page

Filed Under: Everyday Ethics, Head and Neck Tagged With: COSM, head and neck cancer, HNSCC, neck dissection, patient safety, PET, PET-CTIssue: September 2009

You Might Also Like:

  • PET-Directed Management of Node-Positive Head and Neck Cancers
  • PET Not Ready for Routine Management of Head and Neck Cancer
  • Treatment Options: Study reports neck dissection effective in patients with residual disease
  • PET-CT is Cost-Effective for N2 Disease After Chemoradiotherapy

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939