• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

What Otolaryngologists Can Do to Lessen Their Carbon Footprint

by Amanda E. Dilger, MD, Neelima Tummala, MD, and Natalie A. Krane, MD • March 16, 2021

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Dr. Dilger is a surgeon at Massachusetts Eye and Ear and an instructor in otolaryngology–head and neck surgery at Harvard Medical School. Dr. Tummala is an assistant professor of surgery at the George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences. Dr. Krane is an otolaryngologist specializing in facial plastic and reconstructive surgery at The University of Kansas Medical Center.

You Might Also Like

  • Carbon Dioxide Laser-Assisted Cartilage Reshaping Otoplasty
  • Is There a Link Between Climate Change and Rhinosinusitis? Researchers Explore Possibilities
  • Carbon Dioxide Laser Scores Well on Patient Tolerance in the Office
  • Green Is the Healthy Way to Go
Explore This Issue
March 2021

Healthcare and Greenhouse Gases

“Health Care’s Climate Footprint,” published jointly by Health Care Without Harm, an international nongovernmental organization focusing on sustainability and the worldwide health sector, and Arup, an environmentally focused firm of designers, planners, engineers, architects, consultants, and technical specialists, offers a detailed estimate of healthcare’s global climate footprint. The report contains some startling facts about the impact that worldwide healthcare has on the planet:

  • The global healthcare industry is responsible for 2 gigatons of carbon dioxide each year, or 4.4% of worldwide net emissions—the equivalent of 514 coal-fired power plants. 
  • If the global healthcare sector were a country, it would be the world’s fifth-largest emitter of greenhouse gases on the planet. Healthcare’s climate footprint is smaller than that of China, the United States, India, and Russia, but larger than that of Japan and Brazil. 
  • The top three emitters of healthcare greenhouse gas emissions, the United States, China, and the collective countries of the European Union, comprise more than half (56%) of the world’s total healthcare climate footprint.
  • A limited estimate covering 31 countries showed that an additional nearly 1% of healthcare’s global climate footprint—nearly 4 million metric tons of emissions—come from the sector’s use of anesthetic gases and metered dose inhalers. 
  • The gases commonly used for anesthesia (nitrous oxide and the fluorinated gases sevoflurane, isoflurane, and desflurane) are potent greenhouse gases. At present, the majority of these gases enter the atmosphere, contributing at least 0.6% of healthcare’s global climate impact.
  • When viewed across healthcare facilities, purchased electricity, steam, cooling and heating, and supply chain emissions, more than half of healthcare’s footprint is attributable to energy use—primarily the consumption of electricity, gas, steam and air conditioning supply combined with health sector operational emissions. 
  • There’s a strong but not absolute correlation between a country’s healthcare climate footprint and a country’s healthcare spending. Generally, the higher the spending on healthcare, measured as percentage of a country’s gross domestic product, the higher the per capita healthcare emissions come from that country.

There were some data gaps that the report wasn’t able to address given limited time and resources and the nature of the methodology used, but through the recommendations given in the report, the organizations hope to chart the course for zero emissions from healthcare sources by the year 2050. You can read the report in its entirety.

—Amy E. Hamaker

Pages: 1 2 3 4 | Single Page

Filed Under: Features, Home Slider Tagged With: climate changeIssue: March 2021

You Might Also Like:

  • Carbon Dioxide Laser-Assisted Cartilage Reshaping Otoplasty
  • Is There a Link Between Climate Change and Rhinosinusitis? Researchers Explore Possibilities
  • Carbon Dioxide Laser Scores Well on Patient Tolerance in the Office
  • Green Is the Healthy Way to Go

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939