• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

When is the Optimal Time to Reduce Pediatric Nasal Bone Fractures?

by By Sheng Zhou, MD, Marta Kulich, MD, Christopher Pool, MD, Javan Nation, MD, Shelby Leuin, MD, Jeffrey A. Koempel, MD, MBA, and Vijay A. Patel, MD • August 17, 2023

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

TRIO Best PracticeTRIO Best Practice articles are brief, structured reviews designed to provide the busy clinician with a handy outline and reference for day-to-day clinical decision making. The ENTtoday summary below includes the Background and Best Practice sections of the original article. To view the complete Laryngoscope articles free of charge, visit Laryngoscope.com.

You Might Also Like

  • When Is Immediate Surgical Intervention Required for Isolated Orbital Blowout Fractures?
  • Prophylactic Antibiotics Should Be Used Conservatively in Setting Mandibular Fractures
  • Is Fixation of Mandible Fractures Urgent?
  • Are Cochlear Implants a Viable Option Following Temporal Bone Fracture?
Explore This Issue
August 2023

BACKGROUND

Nasal bone fractures are the most common subsite of pediatric maxillofacial trauma (J Craniofac Surg. 2008;19:339–349), which affects older children and often results from physical altercations, falls, motor vehicle accidents, and sports-related injuries (J Craniofac Surg. 2012;23:1364–1366). The timing of operative repair has been well characterized in adults, but definitive practice guidelines for fracture reduction are lacking for children. Historically, nasal fractures have been reduced within seven days as pediatric patients are thought to undergo rapid osseous healing. Delayed nasal fracture reduction, however, allows soft tissue edema to abate, potentially aiding intraoperative result assessment. This comprehensive review aims to serve as a primer in understanding the current evidence surrounding optimal timing for pediatric nasal fracture repair.

Independent searches of the PubMed, MEDLINE, and Cochrane databases were performed on December 11, 2022, by the first and senior authors to identify articles that specifically described the timing of pediatric nasal fracture repair using the Boolean method and relevant search term combinations. Articles were sorted by best match without limitations on article type, text availability, or publication date. To identify additional articles, the reference lists of selected articles were individually searched as well as citing articles. This yielded a total of 213 unique hits, of which 26 articles were directly analyzed for further review. Excluded articles included studies with facial fractures other than nasal bone fractures and nontraumatic pediatric rhinology. The remaining articles were assessed to determine which studies described the direct impact of timing on postoperative outcomes following nasal fracture reduction, of which four studies were included for final analysis.

BEST PRACTICE

The available literature demonstrates that nasal fracture reduction within 14 days of injury may have comparable aesthetic results with operative intervention closer to the date of initial injury. Clinicians should be cognizant of relevant timelines when counseling children and families regarding available treatment options for nasal fracture injuries. Future prospective data collection and multi-institutional collaborations are necessary to better understand the long-term cosmetic and functional sequelae of pediatric nasal bone reduction and whether age plays a definitive role in treatment outcomes.

Although there is no evidence that one specific value determines surgical candidacy or precisely predicts postoperative pulmonary compromise, this assessment will inform the perioperative risk factors to aid in a shared treatment decision-making process. Ultimately, multi-institutional prospective studies are needed to better understand the role of preoperative testing in evaluating candidacy and pulmonary- related outcomes in patients undergoing open or endoscopic partial laryngeal surgery.

Pages: 1 2 | Single Page

Filed Under: Pediatric, Pediatric, Practice Focus, TRIO Best Practices Tagged With: nasal bone fractureIssue: August 2023

You Might Also Like:

  • When Is Immediate Surgical Intervention Required for Isolated Orbital Blowout Fractures?
  • Prophylactic Antibiotics Should Be Used Conservatively in Setting Mandibular Fractures
  • Is Fixation of Mandible Fractures Urgent?
  • Are Cochlear Implants a Viable Option Following Temporal Bone Fracture?

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939