• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Which Otologic Procedures Poses the Greatest Risk of Aerosol Generation?

by Linda Kossoff • February 16, 2021

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

What is the nature and quantity of aerosol generation during common otologic procedures in both cadaveric surgical simulation and live patient surgery?

BOTTOM LINE: Significant aerosol levels were generated during cadaveric simulation of mastoidectomy, and aerosol spikes were appreciated during cochlear implantation in live patients.

You Might Also Like

  • Office Laryngoscopy Is Not Aerosol Generating When Evaluated by Optical Particle Sizer
  • Best Practice in Tympanoplasty
  • Does Concomitant Mastoidectomy Improve Outcomes for Tympanic Membrane Perforation Repair?
  • Most ED Visits for Otologic Complaints are Non-Emergencies
Explore This Issue
February 2021

BACKGROUND: Implementation of prolonged wait times following aerosol-generating procedures (AGP) has important safety implications in medical practice. Although SARS-CoV-2 is believed to be transmitted primarily through respiratory droplets, the risk of aerosolization and airborne transmission is a significant concern in otolaryngology. 

STUDY DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial.

SETTING: Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis.

SYNOPSIS: The team used both cadaveric surgical simulation and live patient surgery to assess aerosol generation during specific otologic procedures. One surgeon performed all of the cadaveric simulation procedures (left- and right-sided tympanoplasty and mastoidectomy on the first cadaver head; and left-sided tympanoplasty and mastoidectomy, and first and second left and right temporalis fascia graft harvest (TFGH) procedures on the second cadaver head). A HEPA filtration system was used between experimental conditions to return aerosols back to baseline levels. Results showed that drilling used during mastoidectomy generated high concentrations of aerosols. Aerosol levels during tympanoplasty were lesser but significant, and likely related to suction. Similar increases were not seen during cold TFGH in the simulation. For the two live patient cochlear implant surgeries, baseline aerosol concentrations were measured for 60 seconds prior to the start of each case and then for each second during surgery. Spikes in aerosols occurred during both cases, all associated with mastoid drilling. Study limitations included limited range and parameters in aerosol measurement.

CITATION: Sharma D, Campiti VJ, Ye MJ, et al. Aerosol generation during cadaveric simulation of otologic surgery and live cochlear implantation [published online ahead of print December 16, 2020]. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. doi:10.1002/lio2.506.

Filed Under: COVID19, Literature Reviews Tagged With: COVID19Issue: February 2021

You Might Also Like:

  • Office Laryngoscopy Is Not Aerosol Generating When Evaluated by Optical Particle Sizer
  • Best Practice in Tympanoplasty
  • Does Concomitant Mastoidectomy Improve Outcomes for Tympanic Membrane Perforation Repair?
  • Most ED Visits for Otologic Complaints are Non-Emergencies

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939