• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Best Practice in Tympanoplasty

by Sue Pondrom • August 2, 2011

  • Tweet
  • Email
Print-Friendly Version

Does concomitant mastoidectomy improve outcomes for patients undergoing repair of tympanic membrane perforations?

Background: Controversy currently exists regarding the appropriate treatment of tympanic membrane perforations resulting from chronic suppurative otitis media (CSOM) without cholesteatoma. Proponents for mastoidectomy contend that surgical opening of the mastoid pneumatic system buffers pressure changes in the middle ear and allows for the debridement of infected tissue and devitalized bone that may not otherwise be treated effectively. Recent studies, however, refute the claim that mastoidectomy improves outcomes.

You Might Also Like

  • Does Concomitant Mastoidectomy Improve Outcomes for Tympanic Membrane Perforation Repair?
  • How to: An Innovative Tympanoplasty—Sleeve and Tongue Technique
  • Tympanoplasty Tips: Otology Experts Give Advice on the Procedure
  • Cortisporin Use in Routine Tympanoplasty
Explore This Issue
August 2011

Study design: Literature review.

Setting: Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tenn.

Synopsis: The authors described four retrospective case-controlled studies with internal controls and one retrospective cohort study, all for the treatment of noncholesteatomatous CSOM. In a study with 320 patients undergoing tympanoplasty alone and 144 with mastoidectomy, the rate of perforation repair was not statistically significant between the two groups but there were clinically significant trends toward improved hearing and decreased need for subsequent procedures. In a study with 323 patients with CSOM, the authors concluded that mastoidectomy is an avoidable procedure. Another study with 251 patients ended with the researchers concluding that mastoidectomy is not helpful for patients with noncholesteatomatous CSOM. A study with 47 children showed that approximately 40 percent required at least one subsequent operation. And, with an analysis of 46 patients undergoing tympanoplasty alone and 46 undergoing tympanomastoidectomy, the authors concluded that mastoidectomy may not be necessary.

Bottom line: As evidenced in the literature, tympanoplasty alone may be sufficient for repair of simple and uncomplicated tympanic membrane perforations.

Citation: Hall JE, McRackan TR, Labadie RF. Does concomitant mastoidectomy improve outcomes for patients undergoing repair of tympanic membrane perforations? Laryngoscope. 2011;121(8):1598-1600.

-Reviewed by Sue Pondrom

Filed Under: Literature Reviews, Otology/Neurotology Tagged With: best practice, outcomes, tympanic membrane perforations, tympanoplastyIssue: August 2011

You Might Also Like:

  • Does Concomitant Mastoidectomy Improve Outcomes for Tympanic Membrane Perforation Repair?
  • How to: An Innovative Tympanoplasty—Sleeve and Tongue Technique
  • Tympanoplasty Tips: Otology Experts Give Advice on the Procedure
  • Cortisporin Use in Routine Tympanoplasty

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Have you invented or patented something that betters the field of otolaryngology?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • The Best Site for Pediatric TT Placement: OR or Office?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Keeping Watch for Skin Cancers on the Head and Neck

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Leaky Pipes—Time to Focus on Our Foundations
    • You Are Among Friends: The Value Of Being In A Group
    • How To: Full Endoscopic Procedures of Total Parotidectomy
    • How To: Does Intralesional Steroid Injection Effectively Mitigate Vocal Fold Scarring in a Rabbit Model?
    • What Is the Optimal Anticoagulation in HGNS Surgery in Patients with High-Risk Cardiac Comorbidities?

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939