• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Who Should Perform Facial Cosmetic Procedures?: Turf Battle Between Core and Non-Core Physicians

by Alice Goodman • March 1, 2007

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

States need to have better regulations and if regulations are in place, states need to enforce them, Dr. Weiss commented.

You Might Also Like

  • Why Facial Plastic Surgeons Should Consider Bringing More Surgical Procedures In-House
  • Trends in Facial Plastic Surgery: New Patient Groups Bring New Challenges
  • Would Physicians Perform Better if They Didn’t Have to Memorize?
  • Patients, Surgeons May Pay the Price for Cosmetic Surgery Tax
Explore This Issue
March 2007

She also believes that patients should be more proactive in checking credentials and training of physicians and not agree to be treated by non-physicians who are not supervised by an experienced and well-trained physician.

NJ Governor Vetoes Repeal of Cosmetic Surgery Tax

Weeks after the state legislature unanimously passed legislation to repeal the state’s gross receipts tax on cosmetic surgery, New Jersey Governor Jon S. Corzine vetoed A-2282 on January 26; as of press time, supporters of the legislation were considering their options. The tax was enacted in June 2004 to help balance the state budget but the bill’s sponsors said its effect was to push consumers to go to states without the tax for cosmetic surgery.

Gov. Corzine, in his veto statement, noted that the tax generated $10 million for the state’s charity care program in 2006. I cannot support repealing this tax, midway through the fiscal year, without establishing an alternative revenue stream to support charity care, he said.

As part of advocacy efforts in support of the tax repeal, more than 60 New Jersey surgeons used the Surgery State Legislative Action Center (www.facs.org /sslac/index.html) to contact the governor’s office.

©2007 The Triological Society

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 | Single Page

Filed Under: Articles, Clinical, Cover Article, Features Issue: March 2007

You Might Also Like:

  • Why Facial Plastic Surgeons Should Consider Bringing More Surgical Procedures In-House
  • Trends in Facial Plastic Surgery: New Patient Groups Bring New Challenges
  • Would Physicians Perform Better if They Didn’t Have to Memorize?
  • Patients, Surgeons May Pay the Price for Cosmetic Surgery Tax

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939