ENTtoday
  • Home
  • COVID-19
  • Practice Focus
    • Allergy
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Departments
    • Issue Archive
    • TRIO Best Practices
      • Allergy
      • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
      • Head and Neck
      • Laryngology
      • Otology/Neurotology
      • Pediatric
      • Rhinology
      • Sleep Medicine
    • Career Development
    • Case of the Month
    • Everyday Ethics
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Medical Education
    • Online Exclusives
    • Practice Management
    • Resident Focus
    • Rx: Wellness
    • Special Reports
    • Tech Talk
    • Viewpoint
    • What’s Your O.R. Playlist?
  • Literature Reviews
    • Allergy
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Events
    • Featured Events
    • TRIO Meetings
  • Contact Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Triological Society
    • Advertising Staff
    • Subscribe
  • Advertise
    • Place an Ad
    • Classifieds
    • Rate Card
  • Search

Who Should Perform Facial Cosmetic Procedures?: Turf Battle Between Core and Non-Core Physicians

by Alice Goodman • March 1, 2007

  • Tweet
  • Email
Print-Friendly Version

These days, it is not uncommon for doctors from all types of specialties to offer aesthetic procedures for the face, such as filler and Botox injections for wrinkles and superficial peels with lasers or glycolic acid to remove sunspots and wrinkles. According to a recent New York Times article, obstetrician/gynecologists, family physicians, and other doctors are offering these services to patients after completing only brief training, and patients may not be savvy enough to question their credentials. The incursion of non-core physicians into the turf of facial plastic surgeons and dermatologists is worrisome to some core physicians for several reasons: threats related to loss of income and potential dangers to patients. Additionally, some worry that this is a slippery slope and that some of these non-core physicians will turn to more invasive procedures, increasing the dangers of surgery gone awry to unsuspecting patients.

You Might Also Like

  • Trends in Facial Plastic Surgery: New Patient Groups Bring New Challenges
  • Would Physicians Perform Better if They Didn’t Have to Memorize?
  • Patients, Surgeons May Pay the Price for Cosmetic Surgery Tax
  • Would Physicians Perform Better if They Didn’t Have to Memorize?
Explore This Issue
March 2007
Figure. Superficial cosmetic procedures, which are comparatively easy to learn and perform and are relatively low-risk, are becoming more popular among non-core physicians, causing concern to facial plastic surgeons and dermatologists.

click for large version
Figure. Superficial cosmetic procedures, which are comparatively easy to learn and perform and are relatively low-risk, are becoming more popular among non-core physicians, causing concern to facial plastic surgeons and dermatologists.

Why They Do It

Core physicians interviewed for this article agreed that one of the main reasons non-core physicians are opting to offer superficial cosmetic procedures is a quick and uncomplicated financial reward. Superficial cosmetic procedures procedures are relatively easy to learn and to perform, are low-risk, and are not reimbursable by insurance companies, so customers pay cash. Little or no paperwork is involved, and hardly any staff time is taken up with billing and collecting fees.

The main reason non-core physicians are entering this arena is financial. The physician can take advantage of cash payments without the need to bill third-party payers. This is a short-circuit way for them to improve their bottom line, because these procedures are easy to do and there is a fast turnover, said Shan Baker, MD, President of the American Board of Facial and Plastic Reconstructive Surgeons (ABFPRS).

Dr. Baker believes that it is not particularly dangerous for non-core physicians who are well trained to offer superficial cosmetic treatments such as fillers and peels. But he sees this as a first step by non-board-certified physicians to get into more complex surgical procedures that he believes could be dangerous for patients, such as chemical peels, face lifts, and dermabrasion.

With more complex procedures, it becomes a quality of care issue. Patients are confused and don’t really know if a doctor is adequately trained to perform these procedures. They should be made aware of the need to have proper credentials, he said.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 | Single Page

Filed Under: Articles, Clinical, Cover Article, Features Issue: March 2007

You Might Also Like:

  • Trends in Facial Plastic Surgery: New Patient Groups Bring New Challenges
  • Would Physicians Perform Better if They Didn’t Have to Memorize?
  • Patients, Surgeons May Pay the Price for Cosmetic Surgery Tax
  • Would Physicians Perform Better if They Didn’t Have to Memorize?

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

The Laryngoscope
Ensure you have all the latest research at your fingertips; Subscribe to The Laryngoscope today!

Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
Open access journal in otolaryngology – head and neck surgery is currently accepting submissions.

Classifieds

View the classified ads »

TRIO Best Practices

View the TRIO Best Practices »

Top Articles for Residents

  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Why More MDs, Medical Residents Are Choosing to Pursue Additional Academic Degrees
  • What Physicians Need to Know about Investing Before Hiring a Financial Advisor
  • Tips to Help You Regain Your Sense of Self
  • Should USMLE Step 1 Change from Numeric Score to Pass/Fail?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • Vertigo in the Elderly: What Does It Mean?
    • Experts Delve into Treatment Options for Laryngopharyngeal Reflux
    • Non-Acidic Reflux Explains Lack of Response to H2 Blockers and PPIs
    • How 3D Printing Is Transforming the Pediatric Otolaryngology Field
    • Vertigo in the Elderly: What Does It Mean?
    • New Developments in the Management of Eustachian Tube Dysfunction
    • Some Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Resists PPI Treatment
    • Eustachian Tuboplasty: A Potential New Option for Chronic Tube Dysfunction and Patulous Disease
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • Why Virtual Grand Rounds May Be Here to Stay
    • Otolaryngologist Leverages His Love of Pinball into Second Business
    • These New Imaging Advances May Help to Protect Parathyroids
    • Is the Training and Cost of a Fellowship Worth It? Here’s What Otolaryngologists Say
    • Which Otologic Procedures Poses the Greatest Risk of Aerosol Generation?

Polls

Have you used 3D-printed materials in your otolaryngology practice?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive
  • Home
  • Contact Us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use

Visit: The Triological Society • The Laryngoscope • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology

Wiley
© 2021 The Triological Society. All Rights Reserved.
ISSN 1559-4939

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
This site uses cookies: Find out more.