• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Who Should Perform Facial Cosmetic Procedures?: Turf Battle Between Core and Non-Core Physicians

by Alice Goodman • March 1, 2007

  • Tweet
  • Email
Print-Friendly Version

These days, it is not uncommon for doctors from all types of specialties to offer aesthetic procedures for the face, such as filler and Botox injections for wrinkles and superficial peels with lasers or glycolic acid to remove sunspots and wrinkles. According to a recent New York Times article, obstetrician/gynecologists, family physicians, and other doctors are offering these services to patients after completing only brief training, and patients may not be savvy enough to question their credentials. The incursion of non-core physicians into the turf of facial plastic surgeons and dermatologists is worrisome to some core physicians for several reasons: threats related to loss of income and potential dangers to patients. Additionally, some worry that this is a slippery slope and that some of these non-core physicians will turn to more invasive procedures, increasing the dangers of surgery gone awry to unsuspecting patients.

You Might Also Like

  • Why Facial Plastic Surgeons Should Consider Bringing More Surgical Procedures In-House
  • Trends in Facial Plastic Surgery: New Patient Groups Bring New Challenges
  • Would Physicians Perform Better if They Didn’t Have to Memorize?
  • Patients, Surgeons May Pay the Price for Cosmetic Surgery Tax
Explore This Issue
March 2007
Figure. Superficial cosmetic procedures, which are comparatively easy to learn and perform and are relatively low-risk, are becoming more popular among non-core physicians, causing concern to facial plastic surgeons and dermatologists.

click for large version
Figure. Superficial cosmetic procedures, which are comparatively easy to learn and perform and are relatively low-risk, are becoming more popular among non-core physicians, causing concern to facial plastic surgeons and dermatologists.

Why They Do It

Core physicians interviewed for this article agreed that one of the main reasons non-core physicians are opting to offer superficial cosmetic procedures is a quick and uncomplicated financial reward. Superficial cosmetic procedures procedures are relatively easy to learn and to perform, are low-risk, and are not reimbursable by insurance companies, so customers pay cash. Little or no paperwork is involved, and hardly any staff time is taken up with billing and collecting fees.

The main reason non-core physicians are entering this arena is financial. The physician can take advantage of cash payments without the need to bill third-party payers. This is a short-circuit way for them to improve their bottom line, because these procedures are easy to do and there is a fast turnover, said Shan Baker, MD, President of the American Board of Facial and Plastic Reconstructive Surgeons (ABFPRS).

Dr. Baker believes that it is not particularly dangerous for non-core physicians who are well trained to offer superficial cosmetic treatments such as fillers and peels. But he sees this as a first step by non-board-certified physicians to get into more complex surgical procedures that he believes could be dangerous for patients, such as chemical peels, face lifts, and dermabrasion.

With more complex procedures, it becomes a quality of care issue. Patients are confused and don’t really know if a doctor is adequately trained to perform these procedures. They should be made aware of the need to have proper credentials, he said.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 | Single Page

Filed Under: Articles, Clinical, Cover Article, Features Issue: March 2007

You Might Also Like:

  • Why Facial Plastic Surgeons Should Consider Bringing More Surgical Procedures In-House
  • Trends in Facial Plastic Surgery: New Patient Groups Bring New Challenges
  • Would Physicians Perform Better if They Didn’t Have to Memorize?
  • Patients, Surgeons May Pay the Price for Cosmetic Surgery Tax

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Have you invented or patented something that betters the field of otolaryngology?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • The Road Less Traveled—at Least by Otolaryngologists

    • The Best Site for Pediatric TT Placement: OR or Office?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Leaky Pipes—Time to Focus on Our Foundations
    • You Are Among Friends: The Value Of Being In A Group
    • How To: Full Endoscopic Procedures of Total Parotidectomy
    • How To: Does Intralesional Steroid Injection Effectively Mitigate Vocal Fold Scarring in a Rabbit Model?
    • What Is the Optimal Anticoagulation in HGNS Surgery in Patients with High-Risk Cardiac Comorbidities?

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939