• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Will Virtual Oral Board Exams Remain an Option After the COVID-19 Pandemic?

by Linda Kossoff • August 16, 2021

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Looking Ahead

The next ABO-HNS exam, in October 2021, will be virtual, but according to Dr. Nussenbaum, no decisions beyond that have been made. “The board will think about what to do in 2022,” he said. “We’re planning to have one more virtual administration to incorporate the things we learned from the February 2021 exam, continue to improve the process and the experience for the examiners and candidates, and then we’ll make a decision shortly afterward based on operational considerations, feedback, and public health safety.”

You Might Also Like

  • Leading Virtual Meetings with Physicians Amid Coronavirus Pandemic
  • A Ray of Hope: ENTtoday’s Board Members and Colleagues are Receiving the COVID Vaccine
  • Letter from the Editor: Long-term Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Our Professional Lives
  • How the COVID-19 Pandemic Changed Medical Conferences
Explore This Issue
August 2021

Having taken the virtual exam, Dr. Holcomb concluded that the advantages of the format outweigh the disadvantages. “Given the significant benefits of convenience and cost, and as long as the threat of COVID-19 resurgence or future pandemics remains, this format remains the safest for candidates and examiners.”

Anticipating the October exam, Dr. Fox has been keeping her ear to the ground. “The folks I have spoken to who took the exam in February didn’t report any technological issues, and the [ABO-HNS] does provide a time to check technology with their system prior to the time of examination,” she said. “I think that if the virtual format is effective, then the board should consider instituting it permanently.”

So far, examiner feedback on the virtual oral exam format has been positive. Moreover, scoring results from February’s test revealed a failure rate consistent with past in-person exams. For this ultimate success, Dr. Nussenbaum credits the board’s “exceptional” group of volunteers. “Without their incredible dedication and commitment to learning this new electronic virtual platform and process, this couldn’t be done,” he concluded. “The incredible, collective team effort from ABO-HNS staff and the examiners was truly inspirational to me.”


Linda Kossoff is a freelance medical writer based in Woodland Hills, Calif.

Security Matters

Administering a medical board exam virtually brings up significant security risks, both in terms of the test material and the administration itself. In devising the virtual format for its recent oral exam, the American Board of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery (ABO-HNS) took prudent measures. “We went to an online secure portal to deliver the content and electronically submit scoring. None of the exam content was downloadable. and everything was only accessible with secure portal access,” said Brian Nussenbaum, MD, ABO-HNS executive director.

With in-person exams, candidates are prohibited from bringing in their smartphone, smart watch, headphones, or other similar devices. However, in a virtual situation, it simply isn’t possible to obtain full visual confirmation that examinees are abiding by the rules. “We required the candidate to provide, via webcam, a 360-degree security scan of the room in which they’re taking the exam,” said Dr. Nussenbaum.

“We were allowed to bring several blank pieces of paper with us and were required to show these to the examiners,” recalled Andrew J. Holcomb, MD, who took the ABO-HNS primary board certification exam in February 2021. “We weren’t required to share our screens, so a candidate certainly could have notes minimized in a separate window, but I know that screen sharing presents other security challenges. So, in general, I was in favor of the approach that was used.”

In addition to these measures, ABO-HNS also provided live proctors to confirm candidate identity and watch candidates during the exam, and significantly revised its cheating policy to include additional considerations specific to virtual exams. “We reviewed the policy several times with candidates, and all candidates were required to attest that they agreed to that policy and understood the consequences of any violations,” explained Dr. Nussenbaum.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 | Single Page

Filed Under: Features, Home Slider Tagged With: COVID19, medical educationIssue: August 2021

You Might Also Like:

  • Leading Virtual Meetings with Physicians Amid Coronavirus Pandemic
  • A Ray of Hope: ENTtoday’s Board Members and Colleagues are Receiving the COVID Vaccine
  • Letter from the Editor: Long-term Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Our Professional Lives
  • How the COVID-19 Pandemic Changed Medical Conferences

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939