• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

New Parotidectomy Quality of Life Index Poised to Help Improve Clinical Practice

by Linda Kossoff • July 8, 2025

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Clinical Question

What is the potential value of a newly developed Parotidectomy Quality of Life Index (PQOL) in addressing the multidimensional nature of patient-centered outcomes from this procedure?

You Might Also Like

  • Benefits, Drawbacks of Free Abdominal Fat Transfer for Parotidectomy Defect Reconstruction
  • Qualitative Research Shows How Patients Feel About Quality-of-Life Issues
  • XR Mandatory Trainee Proficiency Before OR or Not? Which Would You Do?
  • Happy Patients, Happy Doctors: Patient satisfaction surveys will become an important part of your practice
Explore This Issue
July 2025

Bottom Line

Demonstrating excellent internal validity and test–retest reliability, an PQOL may provide the opportunity for improvement in clinical practice.

Background: Parotidectomy is the treatment of choice for most tumors of the parotid gland. While such surgical approaches have excellent outcomes per traditional metrics, patient concerns after parotidectomy are not always considered when reporting surgical success. Few tools currently exist to evaluate the impact of parotidectomy on patient quality of life (QOL).

Study design: Survey study

Setting: Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn.

Synopsis: In this two-phase study, researchers developed and validated a new 35-item patient-reported outcome instrument specific to recovery post-parotidectomy. For phase I (content validation), they mapped 61 items across nine domains related to concerns after parotidectomy and constructed a survey of these items. Thirty of 38 participants who enrolled in the study completed the survey. Participants’ responses were then used to narrow the survey down to 35 items across six domains—pain and sensations, facial appearance, facial nerve function, tumor concerns, immediate surgical recovery, and decision-making and surgical satisfaction—and two standalone items for the final QOL instrument. Researchers enrolled 342 participants for phase II (construct validity, convergent validity, and test–retest reliability), of whom 317 (89% female) completed the narrowed-down survey. Cronbach alpha and pair-wise Pearson correlation coefficients were used to measure internal consistency, reliability, and redundancy. Test–retest reliability was evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficients. Results showed that the PQOL demonstrated excellent content, construct, convergent, and test–retest validity. Authors note that as parotidectomy moves into an era of surgical de-escalation, evaluation of new, minimally invasive techniques via instruments such as the PQOL will be imperative. Study limitations included potential selection bias of the validation cohort.

Citation: Yin LX, et al. Patient-reported quality-of-life outcome measure after parotidectomy. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2025;151:441-449. doi:10.1001/jamaoto.2024.5253.

Filed Under: Head and Neck, Head and Neck, Literature Reviews, Practice Focus Tagged With: Parotidectomy Quality of Life Index, PQOLIssue: July 2025

You Might Also Like:

  • Benefits, Drawbacks of Free Abdominal Fat Transfer for Parotidectomy Defect Reconstruction
  • Qualitative Research Shows How Patients Feel About Quality-of-Life Issues
  • XR Mandatory Trainee Proficiency Before OR or Not? Which Would You Do?
  • Happy Patients, Happy Doctors: Patient satisfaction surveys will become an important part of your practice

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Do you use AI-powered scribes for documentation?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • How to: Positioning for Middle Cranial Fossa Repair of Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Endoscopic Ear Surgery: Advancements and Adoption Challenges 

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • The Importance of Time Away
    • Endoscopic Ear Surgery: Advancements and Adoption Challenges 
    • Reflections from a Past President of the Triological Society
    • ENT Surgeons Explore the Benefits and Challenges of AI-Powered Scribes: Revolutionizing Documentation in Healthcare
    • How To: Open Expansion Laryngoplasty for Combined Glottic and Subglottic Stenosis

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939