• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Language Performance in Disabled Children with Cochlear Implants

by Sue Pondrom • February 1, 2010

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

What are the effects of cochlear implants (CIs) on language among children with disabilities?

Background: Early implantation of a CI in children with typical development is strongly associated with improved outcomes. There are few studies, however, showing the effects of CI among children with additional disabilities, making decision-making and standards of care difficult for families and providers.

You Might Also Like

  • Cochlear Implants Improve Performance and Net Savings in Infants
  • Computer Program May Predict Outcomes of Cochlear Implants in Children
  • Cochlear Implant Effective in Language Development if Implanted at Early Age
  • New Computer Program May Help Predict Outcomes of Cochlear Implants in Children
Explore This Issue
February 2010

Study design: Small cohort study.

Setting: Twenty children with CIs and developmental disabilities were enrolled at Cincinnati Children’s Hospital.

Synopsis: The median age of CI was 24 months and median duration was 27.7 months. The range of nonverbal cognitive quotients (NVCQ) was 27 to 115, with 15 subjects having NVCQs less than 80. Seventy-five percent had cognitive deficits and 55 percent had motor delays.

The objectives of the study were to evaluate language development post-CI and to determine the role that cognition plays in predicting language outcomes among children with developmental disabilities. The team used a combination of retrospective and prospective designs for evaluations.

Although children had significant increases in language age pre- to post-CI, median language quotients did not significantly change after implantation. NVCQ, age at hearing loss diagnosis, implant duration and number of different therapies attended were significant, with NVCQ contributing the most unique variance. Pre-CI language performance did not predict post-CI performance.

Bottom Line: Early measures of nonverbal cognition were the strongest predictor of language, although cognition is not always sufficient for good language development. Earlier ages at hearing loss diagnosis also contributed to higher language skills, although post-CI language skills were not a predictor of post-CI language outcomes. Information gained from this study sets the foundation of understanding appropriate expectations regarding language gains post-implant.

Citation: Meinzen-Derr J, Wiley S, Grether S, et al. Language performance in children with cochlear implants and additional disabilities. The Laryngoscope. 2009;120(2):405-413.

Filed Under: Literature Reviews, Otology/Neurotology, Otology/Neurotology, Practice Focus Tagged With: cochlear implantsIssue: February 2010

You Might Also Like:

  • Cochlear Implants Improve Performance and Net Savings in Infants
  • Computer Program May Predict Outcomes of Cochlear Implants in Children
  • Cochlear Implant Effective in Language Development if Implanted at Early Age
  • New Computer Program May Help Predict Outcomes of Cochlear Implants in Children

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939