• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

The Importance of Timing in Mandible Fracture Repair

by Sue Pondrom • April 27, 2011

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Is fixation of mandible fractures urgent?

Background: There are conflicting reports on the urgency of fixing mandible fractures. While some recommend fixation within the first 72 hours, others claim that repairs that are made as late as five days post-injury do just as well. Although delayed repair can be associated with compromised nutrition, poor hygiene, inflammation, scarring and contamination, a delay can also mean diminished facial swelling and facilitated exposure.

You Might Also Like

  • Erich Arch Bar Use Declines in Favor of Manual Reduction in Mandible Fracture Management
  • Is Fixation of Mandible Fractures Urgent?
  • Is a Tooth Extraction Required if Dentition Lies Within a Mandible Fracture?
  • Patients With Isolated Mandible Fractures Should Be Screened for Concussion
Explore This Issue
May 2011

Study design: Literature review.

Synopsis: The authors reviewed five articles, two from The Laryngoscope and one each from Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Dental Traumatology. A study by Maloney and colleagues found that low infection rate was partly due to the timing of repair, i.e., within the first 72 hours (Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2001;59:879–884). Biller and colleagues noted a significantly greater rate of technical complications in a delayed treatment group (Laryngoscope. 2005;115:769–772).

Outcomes were not impacted with a delay in repair, however, according to studies by Czerwinski and colleagues (Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;122(3):881-885), Furr and colleagues (Laryngoscope. 2006;116(3):427-430) and Hermund and colleagues (Dent Traumatol. 2008;24(1):22-26).

The authors recommended a randomized study to allow an accurate comparison of outcomes but noted that this is unlikely to be achieved.

Bottom line: At present, there is no evidence confirming that immediate repair is necessary for better outcomes with mandible fractures.

Citation: Barker DA, Park SS. Is fixation of mandible fractures urgent? Laryngoscope. 2011;121(5):906-907.

—Reviewed by Sue Pondrom

Filed Under: Facial Plastic/Reconstructive, Literature Reviews Tagged With: clinical, mandible fractureIssue: May 2011

You Might Also Like:

  • Erich Arch Bar Use Declines in Favor of Manual Reduction in Mandible Fracture Management
  • Is Fixation of Mandible Fractures Urgent?
  • Is a Tooth Extraction Required if Dentition Lies Within a Mandible Fracture?
  • Patients With Isolated Mandible Fractures Should Be Screened for Concussion

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939