• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Technology
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
    • SUO Corner
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Technology
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
    • SUO Corner
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Is Anticoagulation Beneficial in Acute Mastoiditis Complicated by Sigmoid Sinus Thrombosis?

by Michael Mather, MBBS, MRes, PGCert, Kate Musgrave, MBBS, BA (Hons), MRCP, PGCert, and Nicholas Dawe, MBBS, MRes, FRCSEd (ORL‐HNS), PGDipMedEd • January 7, 2019

  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

TRIO Best PracticeTRIO Best Practice articles are brief, structured reviews designed to provide the busy clinician with a handy outline and reference for day-to-day clinical decision making. The ENTtoday summaries below include the Background and Best Practice sections of the original article. To view the complete Laryngoscope articles free of charge, visit Laryngoscope.

You Might Also Like

  • What Is the Role of Anticoagulation in Managing Pediatric Temporal Bone Septic Thrombophlebitis?
  • Acute Mastoiditis Admissions Up, Despite Vaccination
  • Myringotomy and Mastoidectomy Have Highest Cure Rates for Pediatric Acute Mastoiditis
  • Myringotomy, Mastoidectomy Have Highest Cure Rates for Pediatric Acute Mastoiditis
Explore This Issue
January 2019

Background

Sigmoid sinus thrombosis (SST) remains a rare but serious intracranial complication of acute mastoiditis. Primary treatment includes surgical drainage by mastoidectomy and broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy. The role of anticoagulation remains controversial. Potential benefits include limiting thrombus propagation, improved sinus recanalization, and reduction in neurological sequelae. These benefits must be considered against potential risks, including intracranial hemorrhage, which is particularly significant in the context of patients who may require further staged surgical intervention.

If a decision is made to anticoagulate, uncertainty exists regarding selection and duration of appropriate agents. Heparin has been the traditional mainstay. However, whereas newer direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have transformed the management of lower limb deep-venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, their role in SST remains unclear.

Furthermore, although screening for thrombophilia may be helpful in guiding management, recommendations regarding testing in this cohort remain poorly defined.

In this review, we aim to explore relevant literature defining the role of anticoagulation in acute mastoiditis complicated by SST.

Best Practice

Presently, evidence to guide decision making about whether to commence anticoagulation in acute mastoiditis complicated by SST is lacking. Due to the low incidence of disease, recommendations are largely based on uncontrolled and nonrandomized case series. In general, larger studies of cerebral vein thrombosis support the use of anticoagulation and have demonstrated that such treatment can lower the mortality rate for these individuals, as currently supported by British Society of Haematology guidelines. Neurological sequelae are recognized, although these are reported in mixed pediatric cohorts that include non-otologic pathologies.

Currently, there is no evidence to support the use of DOACs or routine thrombophilia testing in this population. Management of this condition is complex and should include advice and support from hematology colleagues (Laryngoscope. 2018;128:2435–2436)

Filed Under: Otology/Neurotology, Otology/Neurotology, Practice Focus, TRIO Best Practices Tagged With: acute mastoiditis, anticoagulationIssue: January 2019

You Might Also Like:

  • What Is the Role of Anticoagulation in Managing Pediatric Temporal Bone Septic Thrombophlebitis?
  • Acute Mastoiditis Admissions Up, Despite Vaccination
  • Myringotomy and Mastoidectomy Have Highest Cure Rates for Pediatric Acute Mastoiditis
  • Myringotomy, Mastoidectomy Have Highest Cure Rates for Pediatric Acute Mastoiditis

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

More and more medical trainees are taking dedicated, prolonged gap years. Did you?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Is the SLOR in Otolaryngology Residency Applications Contributing to Rural Disparities?
  • Applications Open for Resident Members of the ENTtoday Editorial Board
  • A Resident’s View of AI in Otolaryngology
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • Resident Pearls: Pediatric Otolaryngologists Share Tips for Safer, Smarter Tonsillectomies
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • Gap Year for Research: Is It Worth It?
    • What Otolaryngologists Can Learn from Athletes
    • Office Laryngoscopy Is Not Aerosol Generating When Evaluated by Optical Particle Sizer
    • What Happens to Medical Students Who Don’t Match?
    • Some Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Resists PPI Treatment
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?
    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?
    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment
    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name
    • Short-Term Efficacy of Biologics in Recalcitrant AFRS: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    • The Devaluation of Otolaryngology: An Evaluation of CMS’s Involvement in Physician Reimbursement
    • Embolized Middle Meningeal Artery as a Surgical Landmark in Infratemporal Fossa
    • Lord of the (Magnetic) Rings: Rigid Bronchoscopy for Aspirated Magnetic Foreign Bodies in Tertiary Bronchi
    • What Otolaryngologists Can Learn from Athletes

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2026 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939