• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Technology
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
    • SUO Corner
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Technology
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
    • SUO Corner
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

More Research Needed to Evaluate Incorporation of Gamification in Medical Education Platforms

by Linda Kossoff • July 13, 2022

  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

What is the current state of gamification within otolaryngological educational platforms, how does it compare with gamification within the broader medical field, and in what direction should it go?

BOTTOM LINE

You Might Also Like

  • Education, Training Needed for Managing Geriatric Otolaryngology Patients
  • Extended Reality Technology in Otolaryngology Education Is Currently Limited to Virtual Reality
  • Survey Highlights Need for Opioid Prescription Guidelines in Otolaryngology Residency Programs, Continuing Medical Education
  • More Research Needed on Gamma Knife Surgery
Explore This Issue
July 2022

There is limited research regarding gamification in medical educational platforms and, despite many simulation studies and attempts to include it, the medical community, including otolaryngology, has not fully embraced gamification within residency education.

BACKGROUND: In recent years, multiple medical specialties have incorporated gamification elements into education platforms. Unlike traditional video games that blend game platforms, technology, or actual games with a particular industry, gamified platforms combine an existing goal with game elements to enhance that goal and are primarily used for didactic lessons.

STUDY DESIGN: Narrative review.

SETTING: Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of Texas, Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas.

SYNOPSIS: Researchers identified 13 studies that met their criteria, each including at least three gamification elements. They sought to evaluate seven established, consolidated components—a point system/leaderboards, question banks or gradable content, social interaction with other participants, progress or levels, immediate feedback, and badges/icons or a reward system—and one novel component, a story line. Ten of the studies incorporated leaderboards, feedback, and social interaction; eight incorporated a question bank; and four incorporated progress bars, rewards, and a story line. The one otolaryngology study incorporated a point system, instant feedback/solution after a question was answered, player-to-player communication, and a leaderboard. Researchers found evidence of significant progress in research on the use of serious games to teach surgical and laparoscopic skills using popular platforms, software, and simulators, but noted that gamification itself had less of an impact on residency education. They cite the main advantage of gamification as user engagement with content and with other residents and called for more studies to determine the elements needed to enhance its use in residency education. Study limitations included the scarcity of gamification research.

CITATION: Westenhaver ZK, Africa RE, Zimmerer RE, et al. Gamification in otolaryngology: A narrative review. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2021;7:291–298.

Filed Under: General Otolaryngology, Literature Reviews Tagged With: medical education, residentsIssue: July 2022

You Might Also Like:

  • Education, Training Needed for Managing Geriatric Otolaryngology Patients
  • Extended Reality Technology in Otolaryngology Education Is Currently Limited to Virtual Reality
  • Survey Highlights Need for Opioid Prescription Guidelines in Otolaryngology Residency Programs, Continuing Medical Education
  • More Research Needed on Gamma Knife Surgery

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

More and more medical trainees are taking dedicated, prolonged gap years. Did you?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Is the SLOR in Otolaryngology Residency Applications Contributing to Rural Disparities?
  • Applications Open for Resident Members of the ENTtoday Editorial Board
  • A Resident’s View of AI in Otolaryngology
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • Resident Pearls: Pediatric Otolaryngologists Share Tips for Safer, Smarter Tonsillectomies
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • Gap Year for Research: Is It Worth It?
    • What Otolaryngologists Can Learn from Athletes
    • Office Laryngoscopy Is Not Aerosol Generating When Evaluated by Optical Particle Sizer
    • Some Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Resists PPI Treatment
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?
    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?
    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment
    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name
    • Short-Term Efficacy of Biologics in Recalcitrant AFRS: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    • The Devaluation of Otolaryngology: An Evaluation of CMS’s Involvement in Physician Reimbursement
    • Embolized Middle Meningeal Artery as a Surgical Landmark in Infratemporal Fossa
    • Lord of the (Magnetic) Rings: Rigid Bronchoscopy for Aspirated Magnetic Foreign Bodies in Tertiary Bronchi
    • What Otolaryngologists Can Learn from Athletes

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2026 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939