• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Technology
    • AI
    • History of Otolaryngology
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
    • SUO Corner
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Extended Reality Technology in Otolaryngology Education Is Currently Limited to Virtual Reality

by Linda Kossoff • November 14, 2022

  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

What is the current state of extended reality use in otolaryngology education?

BOTTOM LINE

You Might Also Like

  • Augmented Reality Technology May Help Guide Facial Reconstructive Surgery
  • Medical Simulation: Limited Funding Limits the Possibilities: Part 2 of 2 articles
  • More Research Needed to Evaluate Incorporation of Gamification in Medical Education Platforms
  • How Underfunded Graduate Medical Education Programs May Affect Otolaryngology
Explore This Issue
November 2022

Current use of extended reality (XR) technology in otolaryngology education is limited to virtual reality (VR).

BACKGROUND: Collectively referred to as XR, simulation technologies are used in patient care, preoperative surgical planning, perioperative assistance, and education. Simulation-based medical education (SBME), including surgical simulators, is known to improve learner knowledge and transfer of skills; however, little is known about current use and outcomes of XR in otolaryngology education.

STUDY DESIGN: Scoping review.

SETTING: Institute of Health Sciences Education, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

SYNOPSIS: Researchers mined the literature for studies involving otolaryngology trainees/medical students who used XR for educational purposes in otolaryngology and reported learner-relevant outcome measures. For the study, XR was defined as fully immersive VR using head-mounted displays (HMDs), nonimmersive (NIVR) and semi-immersive (SIVR) VR, augmented reality (AR), or mixed reality (MR). After initial and full-text screenings, 40 articles were extracted for review. Of these, no studies evaluating the pedagogical use of AR and MR were identified. Most VR studies were categorized as SIVR (29), a few were NIVR, and none used occlusive HMDs; thus, none met current concepts of immersive VR. No studies reported fully immersing participants using an HMD. Most incorporated haptic feedback. Authors note that most studies (29) targeted temporal bone surgery. Similarly, most reported on only a subset of possible educational outcome measures on the Kirkpatrick evaluation framework, with all studies reporting on level 1 (learner reaction) or 2 (knowledge or skill performance) outcomes but not level 3 (assessment of performance) or level 4 (patient outcomes). Most studies focused on medical student learners. Study limitations included the exclusion of studies investigating the psychometric properties of XR devices.

CITATION: Zagury-Orly I, Solinski MA, Nguyen LH, et al. What is the current state of extended reality use in otolaryngology training? A scoping review. [published online ahead of print May 12, 2022]. Laryngoscope.

Filed Under: Head and Neck, Head and Neck, Literature Reviews, Practice Focus Tagged With: medical education, virtual realityIssue: November 2022

You Might Also Like:

  • Augmented Reality Technology May Help Guide Facial Reconstructive Surgery
  • Medical Simulation: Limited Funding Limits the Possibilities: Part 2 of 2 articles
  • More Research Needed to Evaluate Incorporation of Gamification in Medical Education Platforms
  • How Underfunded Graduate Medical Education Programs May Affect Otolaryngology

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Where should ENT publications draw the line on authors' use of generative AI?

View Results

Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Rhinology’s Persistent Gender Gap
  • The Example We Set: Thoughts on the End of Residency Training
  • Is the SLOR in Otolaryngology Residency Applications Contributing to Rural Disparities?
  • Applications Open for Resident Members of the ENTtoday Editorial Board: Deadline Extended
  • A Resident’s View of AI in Otolaryngology
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • History of the Cochlear Implant
    • Empty Nose Syndrome: Physiological, Psychological, or Perhaps a Little of Both?
    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?
    • From Genes to Hearing: What Otolaryngologists Need to Know About Gene Therapy for Hearing Loss
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?
    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?
    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment
    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name
    • ENTs Urged to Look Beyond Refractory Sinus Disease for Underlying Immune Deficiency
    • When a “Blocked Ear” Isn’t Obstructive ETD
    • What Does It Mean to Be Written by a Human?
    • Reevaluating the CMS 90-Day CPAP Adherence Requirement: Persistent Use Among Early Nonadherent Patients
    • Vocal Outcomes After COVR in Porcine Bilateral Vocal Fold Resection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2026 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939