• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Targeted Therapy a Potential Treatment for Head and Neck Cancer

by Heather Lindsey • May 1, 2006

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Targeted therapy in addition to radiation may be a viable approach to head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, although more research is needed before such treatment becomes part of the standard of care, according to experts interviewed for this article.

You Might Also Like

  • Targeted Therapies + Chemo Show Activity in Recurrent/Metastatic Head And Neck Cancer
  • New Treatment for Head and Neck Cancer Means Longer-Lasting Toxicity
  • A Look at Immunotherapy’s Potential for Head and Neck Cancer Treatment
  • Chemoradiation vs. Surgery: Which is Better for Head and Neck Cancer?
Explore This Issue
May 2006

For example, a new study (N Engl J Med. 354;6:567-578) found that concomitant high-dose radiotherapy plus cetuximab, a monoclonal antibody targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), improves locoregional control and reduces mortality in patients with head and neck cancer without increasing the common toxic effects associated with radiotherapy.

One of the study’s implications is that physicians now have a biologic treatment for patients with head and neck cancer, said one of the study authors Roger B. Cohen, MD, Director of the Phase I Clinical Trials Program at the Fox Chase Cancer Center in Philadelphia, Pa. Incidentally, this is the first new therapy for the disease in more than 30 years, added Dr. Cohen, who was with M.D. Anderson Cancer Center in Houston, Tex., at the time of the study.

One day, researchers will come up with the answer of how targeted therapies should be used, but we don’t have it yet, cautioned Marshall Strome, MD, MS, Professor and Chairman of the Cleveland Clinic Head and Neck Institute (Ohio). Targeted therapies may be a treatment for some patients who aren’t up for full platinum-based chemotherapies with radiation or for those can’t undergo surgery, he said.

Research will evaluate patients who receive radiation therapy and chemotherapy after surgery due to a high risk of recurrence and see if they are also candidates for cetuximab in combination with radiation.

New Data Demonstrate Benefits

In the new randomized study, 213 patients received high-dose radiotherapy alone, while 211 received high-dose radiotherapy plus weekly cetuximab at an initial dose of 400 mg per square meter of body-surface area, followed by 250 mg per square meter weekly for the duration of radiotherapy.

The median duration of locoregional control was 24.4 months among patients treated with the combined therapy and 14.9 months among those given radiotherapy. With a median follow-up of 54.0 months, the median duration of overall survival was 49.0 months among patients treated with combined therapy and 29.3 months among those treated with radiotherapy alone. Radiotherapy plus cetuximab significantly prolonged progression-free survival (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.70; P = 0.006).

We are just in the early stages of translating the work done in the lab, which shows improvement in cancer cell death and animal survival with the use of [monoclonal antibodies’, to the bedside. – mdash;Christine Gourin, MD

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 | Single Page

Filed Under: Departments, Head and Neck, Medical Education, Practice Focus Tagged With: cancer, carcinoma, outcomes, radiation, research, surgery, treatmentIssue: May 2006

You Might Also Like:

  • Targeted Therapies + Chemo Show Activity in Recurrent/Metastatic Head And Neck Cancer
  • New Treatment for Head and Neck Cancer Means Longer-Lasting Toxicity
  • A Look at Immunotherapy’s Potential for Head and Neck Cancer Treatment
  • Chemoradiation vs. Surgery: Which is Better for Head and Neck Cancer?

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939