• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

3D Printing Emerges as Tool for Otolaryngologists

by Norra MacReady • July 1, 2013

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

One of the greatest challenges to clinical use lies in finding a plentiful, reliable source of chondrocytes, Dr. Spector said. He estimates that it will require 250 million cells to properly build an ear. “We’re working on a way of expanding the small number of cartilage cells derived from patient biopsies by mixing them with stem cells or other growth factors to turbo-charge their rates of reproduction.”

You Might Also Like

  • How 3D Printing Is Transforming the Pediatric Otolaryngology Field
  • 3D Printing a Key Technology in Head and Neck Surgery Care
  • Telemedicine Emerges as a Valuable Resource After Natural Disasters
  • Evidence Emerges on Treatment for Loss of Smell Due to COVID-19
Explore This Issue
July 2013

Creating an Ear

Three months after implantation, the acellular ear (left) diminished in size, while the cell-seeded one (right) maintained its size and anatomic characteristics.

The Bionic Ear

Another team of researchers, led by Michael McAlpine, PhD, assistant professor of mechanical and aerospace engineering at Princeton University, has fused biology with electronics to create a structure that not only looks like a human ear but also contains a tiny, coiled antenna that can pick up radiofrequency signals. Like Dr. Spector and his colleagues, Dr. McAlpine and colleagues used calf chondrocytes to make the ear itself. For the antenna, they added a polymer infused with silver nanoparticles. “We used a computer software program that defines the structure in three dimensions and also defines where each material should be placed in a layer-by-layer process,” Dr. McAlpine said. “We then fed nanoelectronics, biological and structural components into the printer.” The result: an ear that can receive signals beyond normal human range.

Their goal was to demonstrate the feasibility of merging electronic and biological systems, said David H. Gracias, PhD, associate professor of chemical and biomolecular engineering at Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore, who collaborated with Dr. McAlpine on this research. “Tissues typically are soft and full of water, and there’s a fundamental mismatch between them and electronics, which are made of metal and are fabricated in a dry vacuum and do not like water. Moreover, it’s a challenge to bridge the interface, because metals don’t adhere well to polymers and biological substrates. This research was a proof-of-concept demonstration of the idea that by printing and embedding the antenna within the tissue structure, it was possible to bridge this divide.”

Dr. Gracias can’t help expressing a note of wonderment at these developments. “It’s quite amazing that you can actually print the cells, that they live, they appear to have the morphology of the ear and the antenna is printed and can receive a signal. The idea that you can keep something alive and fuse it with an electronic device and actually get it to work—that’s really something.”

Pages: 1 2 3 4 | Single Page

Filed Under: Features, Head and Neck, Laryngology, Practice Focus Tagged With: 3D printing, additive manufacturing, otolaryngologist, technology, tracheal stentIssue: July 2013

You Might Also Like:

  • How 3D Printing Is Transforming the Pediatric Otolaryngology Field
  • 3D Printing a Key Technology in Head and Neck Surgery Care
  • Telemedicine Emerges as a Valuable Resource After Natural Disasters
  • Evidence Emerges on Treatment for Loss of Smell Due to COVID-19

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939