ENTtoday
  • Home
  • COVID-19
  • Practice Focus
    • Allergy
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Departments
    • Issue Archive
    • TRIO Best Practices
      • Allergy
      • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
      • Head and Neck
      • Laryngology
      • Otology/Neurotology
      • Pediatric
      • Rhinology
      • Sleep Medicine
    • Career Development
    • Case of the Month
    • Everyday Ethics
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Medical Education
    • Online Exclusives
    • Practice Management
    • Resident Focus
    • Rx: Wellness
    • Special Reports
    • Tech Talk
    • Viewpoint
    • What’s Your O.R. Playlist?
  • Literature Reviews
    • Allergy
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Events
    • Featured Events
    • TRIO Meetings
  • Contact Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Triological Society
    • Advertising Staff
    • Subscribe
  • Advertise
    • Place an Ad
    • Classifieds
    • Rate Card
  • Search

A New Direction for Sleep: New OSA guidelines fuel another evidence-based medicine debate

by Mary Beth Nierengarten • December 1, 2010

  • Tweet
  • Email
Print-Friendly Version

Recent publication of practice parameters for surgery in adults with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) by the American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM) has set off another round of debate on the need for otolaryngologists to get involved in generating their own guidelines. Although otolaryngologists have yet to agree on whether or not the time is right for guidelines on surgical treatment for sleep apnea, consensus can be claimed regarding the need perceived by the American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery (AAO-HNS) to get on the evidence-based bandwagon.

You Might Also Like

No related posts.

Explore This Issue
December 2010

“As a specialty, it is very important that we work on developing a way of measuring outcomes that can be applied universally so we can work toward studies that will help us determine best practices,” said John Harwick, MD, an assistant professor of otolaryngology at the University of Florida in Gainesville and a member of the AAO-HNS Sleep Disorders Committee.

Dr. Harwick’s remark points to what is perhaps the key challenge faced by otolaryngologists and other specialties in attempting to develop guidelines: the need to determine the most relevant outcomes and metrics by which to measure optimal diagnosis and treatment. Once metrics are determined, studies are needed to lay the foundation on which guidelines are developed.

Randomized, controlled clinical trials continue to be the so-called “gold standard” of evidence. But these trials require time, money and sufficient patient numbers to detect meaningful outcomes and are, therefore, often lacking. This is particularly true in surgical specialties like otolaryngology (Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2002;128:631-634).

Current Otolaryngological-Related Guidelines

  • Clinical consensus statement: diagnosis and management of nasal valve compromise, July 2010 (Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 143:48-59).
  • Clinical practice guideline: hoarseness (dysphonia), September 2009 (Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 141:S1-S31).
  • Clinical practice guideline: benign paroxysmal positional vertigo, September 2008 (Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 139:S47-S81).
  • Practice advisory for the prevention and management of operating room fires, May 2008 (Anesthesiology. 108(5):786-801).
  • Clinical practice guideline: adult sinusitis, September 2007 (Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 137:S1-S31).
  • Clinical practice guideline: acute otitis externa, April 2006 (Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 134:S4-S23).
  • Clinical practice guideline: otitis media with effusion, May 2004 (Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 130(5 Suppl):S95-S118).

Source: AAO-HNS

Given this problem, many so-called clinical guidelines are more aptly called “consensus statements” or “practice parameters,” because they rely on other types of evidence such as expert opinion and less rigorous published data like retrospective analyses and case-control studies.

The problem that faces otolaryngologists, as it does physicians in other specialties, is how to generate appropriate and relevant guidelines, given the dearth of evidence. At stake is the reality that other specialties that cross over into areas related to otolaryngology will develop these guidelines, as highlighted this year by the AASM’s publication of the surgical management of sleep apnea (SLEEP. 2010;33(10):1408-1413).

Response to the AASM Guidelines

Last year it was hoarseness, this year sleep apnea. “Each of the guidelines that has come out has created spirited discussion,” said Pell Wardrop, MD, chair of the AAO-HNS Sleep Disorders Committee. “The hoarseness guidelines that came out in 2009 were a hot topic at the Academy last year. The biggest stir this year was the AASM sleep surgery practice parameters.”

Pages: 1 2 3 4 | Single Page

Filed Under: Departments, Medical Education, Practice Focus, Sleep Medicine Tagged With: debate, evidence-based medicine, guidelines, Obstructive sleep apnea, polysomnography, sleep medicine, sleep-disordered breathing, tonsillectomyIssue: December 2010

You Might Also Like:

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

The Laryngoscope
Ensure you have all the latest research at your fingertips; Subscribe to The Laryngoscope today!

Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
Open access journal in otolaryngology – head and neck surgery is currently accepting submissions.

Classifieds

View the classified ads »

TRIO Best Practices

View the TRIO Best Practices »

Top Articles for Residents

  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Why More MDs, Medical Residents Are Choosing to Pursue Additional Academic Degrees
  • What Physicians Need to Know about Investing Before Hiring a Financial Advisor
  • Tips to Help You Regain Your Sense of Self
  • Should USMLE Step 1 Change from Numeric Score to Pass/Fail?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?
    • Neurogenic Cough Is Often a Diagnosis of Exclusion
    • What Happens to Medical Students Who Don’t Match?
    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • What Happens to Medical Students Who Don’t Match?
    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?
    • Vertigo in the Elderly: What Does It Mean?
    • Neurogenic Cough Is Often a Diagnosis of Exclusion
    • Why We Get Colds
    • Are the Jobs in Healthcare Good Jobs?
    • What Really Works in Functional Rhinoplasty?
    • Is the Best Modality to Assess Vocal Fold Mobility in Children Flexible Fiberoptic Laryngoscopy or Ultrasound?
    • Three Primary Treatment Strategies Show No Differences in Swallow Outcome for Patients with Low- to Intermediate-Risk Tonsil Cancer

Polls

Do you have physician assistants in your otolaryngology practice?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive
  • Home
  • Contact Us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences

Visit: The Triological Society • The Laryngoscope • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology

Wiley
© 2023 The Triological Society. All Rights Reserved.
ISSN 1559-4939