• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Advertise with Caution: State laws restrict how physicians can market themselves

by Steven M. Harris, Esq. • December 1, 2010

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Many laws also categorically restrict or prohibit certain types of advertisements. For example, advertisements containing endorsements or testimonials by patients, colleagues, family members, friends, actors, celebrities, and others are frequently restricted—or prohibited altogether. Illinois’ Medical Practice Act, for example, deems it unlawful for a physician to use testimonials to entice the public. Under Texas’ laws, however, an advertisement is false, deceptive or misleading if it “contains a testimonial that includes false, deceptive, or misleading statements, or fails to include disclaimers or warnings as to the credentials of the person making the testimonial.”

You Might Also Like

  • COSM 2012: TRIO Guest of Honor Cautions against Physician Advertising
  • A Seller’s Market: How to prepare your practice for sale to a hospital
  • Analyzing the Latest Gender-Affirming Care Restrictions in State Laws
  • Multi-State Licensure Plan for Physicians Nears Reality
Explore This Issue
December 2010

A recent advertisement for a health care procedure that featured a world-recognized athlete, along with a statement about his satisfaction with the procedure, was found to be in violation of a state’s physician advertising law and was prohibited from further dissemination in that state. The physician whose practice was linked to the advertisement was found to have violated the state’s statute and was subjected to disciplinary action.

The American Medical Association’s (AMA) Code of Medical Ethics warns that “testimonials of patients as to the physician’s skill or the quality of the physician’s professional services tend to be deceptive when they do not reflect the results that patients with conditions comparable to the testimoniant’s condition generally receive,” and further states that “objective claims regarding experience, competence, and the quality of physicians and the services they provide may be made only if they are factually supportable. Similarly, generalized statements of satisfaction with a physician’s services may be made if they are representative of the experiences of that physician’s patients.”

Typically, state laws provide state attorney generals the power to sue physicians who have engaged in false or deceptive advertising and may impose monetary fines or enjoin the physician from further disseminating the advertisement at issue. State law may also permit patients to sue the physician for monetary damages, if the patient can prove that he or she was injured by the physician’s false or deceptive advertisement.

Even if an advertisement does not appear to be in violation of a state’s laws, it is important to be aware of advertisements that cross state lines. Although Dr. M’s practice is located in New York, he was interested in attracting patients from neighboring cities in New Jersey and Pennsylvania, so he intended to publish his advertisements in newspapers in select cities in all three states. Thus, I reviewed Dr. M’s advertisements not only in light of New York laws regarding physician advertising, but also considering those laws in New Jersey and Pennsylvania.

State laws provide state attorneys general the power to sue physicians engaged in false or deceptive advertising and may impose monetary fines.

Your Responsibility

While advertising can prove lucrative, increasing a medical practice’s patient base, it is imperative to incorporate a lawyer well versed in federal and state physician advertising laws into your marketing team. When a physician contracts with a marketing consultant or advertising group, I often negotiate a representation in the service agreement stating that the advertisement complies with applicable federal and state laws. If the advertising agency makes a mistake, the physician may sue for damages. Unfortunately, that defense would not be viable in a hearing before the state board. You, the physician, are always ultimately responsible for the advertisement and for protecting your license.

Pages: 1 2 3 | Single Page

Filed Under: Departments, Everyday Ethics, Legal Matters, Practice Management Tagged With: Ethics, lawsuits, legal, marketing, practice managementIssue: December 2010

You Might Also Like:

  • COSM 2012: TRIO Guest of Honor Cautions against Physician Advertising
  • A Seller’s Market: How to prepare your practice for sale to a hospital
  • Analyzing the Latest Gender-Affirming Care Restrictions in State Laws
  • Multi-State Licensure Plan for Physicians Nears Reality

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939