• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

AHRQ Tool Fosters Physician-Patient Communication After Adverse Events

by Mary Beth Nierengarten • December 12, 2016

  • Tweet
  • Email
Print-Friendly Version

In an ongoing effort to assist healthcare systems and clinicians improve patient safety, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) is offering a new online toolkit aimed at helping clinicians better communicate with patients and caregivers in situations when something goes wrong with a patient’s care.

You Might Also Like

  • U.K. Surgeons Report Being Negatively Affected by Adverse Events
  • Adverse Events in the Medical Office Setting
  • No Adverse Events from Monopolar Electrosurgery Use in Patients with Cochlear Implants
  • Checklist Improves Communication During Patient Transfers

The toolkit implements a process called Communication and Optimal Resolution (CANDOR), a process that hospitals and health systems can draw on to immediately respond when a patient has been harmed due to medical care. The toolkit is built on the premise that candid, empathetic communication delivered in a timely manner fosters trust between the clinician and patient/caregiver and ultimately improves patient safety.

“The program is intended to support all types of healthcare organizations and systems to remove barriers to the reporting of near misses and errors and to encourage open communication about how to prevent future harms,” said Jeff Brady, MD, director of the AHRQ Center for Quality Improvement and Patient Safety.

According to Dr. Brady, the CANDOR toolkit was developed based on the best practices already in use by some U.S. health systems and hospitals. “Evidence collected from hospitals that have developed communication and resolution programs show such initiatives reduce liability costs and increase appropriate resolution when something goes wrong,” he said.

The need for such a toolkit is highlighted by both the numbers that show that medical errors are not uncommon as well as by a common response by many hospitals and providers to remain silent about the error. “CANDOR is necessary because the culture in many institutions results in a ‘wall of silence’ following an adverse event,” wrote AHRQ director Andy Bindman, MD, in a post on May 23, 2016, on the blog “AHRQ Views.” He says he understands this response given the range of emotions—from confusion and fear to embarrassment and guilt—that clinicians may feel when an adverse event occurs.

“We work so hard to diagnose and heal patients,” he wrote, “but we are usually unprepared to talk about adverse events and medical errors when they occur.”

Dr. Bindman said that CANDOR “envisions a different approach” whereby hospitals and providers recognize that adverse events do happen and proactively disclose the harm to patients and their caregivers as soon as possible.

There are many benefits of explaining safety events to patients as well as providing an apology when appropriate, said Dr. Brady. Using CANDOR, he added, provides a systems-based approach to both embracing a culture of patient safety as well as a strategy to avoid repeat adverse events. However, he emphasized that hospitals that currently do not have communications and resolution programs may proceed cautiously when considering CANDOR as it represents a “new way of doing business.”

“For those facilities, the challenge is convincing decision makers to reconsider postures that limit the sharing of information and avoid an admission of fault,” he said.

The CANDOR toolkit includes facilitator notes, slides, and online videos and is available free of charge.

Pages: 1 2 | Multi-Page

Filed Under: Online Exclusives Tagged With: adverse events, communication

You Might Also Like:

  • U.K. Surgeons Report Being Negatively Affected by Adverse Events
  • Adverse Events in the Medical Office Setting
  • No Adverse Events from Monopolar Electrosurgery Use in Patients with Cochlear Implants
  • Checklist Improves Communication During Patient Transfers

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Have you invented or patented something that betters the field of otolaryngology?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • The Best Site for Pediatric TT Placement: OR or Office?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Keeping Watch for Skin Cancers on the Head and Neck

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Leaky Pipes—Time to Focus on Our Foundations
    • You Are Among Friends: The Value Of Being In A Group
    • How To: Full Endoscopic Procedures of Total Parotidectomy
    • How To: Does Intralesional Steroid Injection Effectively Mitigate Vocal Fold Scarring in a Rabbit Model?
    • What Is the Optimal Anticoagulation in HGNS Surgery in Patients with High-Risk Cardiac Comorbidities?

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939