• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

No Adverse Events from Monopolar Electrosurgery Use in Patients with Cochlear Implants

by Linda Kossoff • April 25, 2023

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

What is the safety profile of monopolar electrosurgery (MES) in patients with cochlear implants (CIs)?

BOTTOM LINE

You Might Also Like

  • No Evidence of CI Damage During Monopolar Cautery
  • Language Performance in Disabled Children with Cochlear Implants
  • Benefits of Cochlear Implants in Single-Sided Deafness Patients
  • U.K. Surgeons Report Being Negatively Affected by Adverse Events
Explore This Issue
April 2023

No adverse events resulted from MES use in patients with CIs.

BACKGROUND: Monopolar electrosurgery is a versatile tool used to accomplish incision, dissection, or homeostasis during surgical procedures. Theoretically, MES use carries a risk of diversion of its electrosurgical current to existing implanted devices such as CIs; however, there is little reported evidence that substantiates CI device damage caused by MES.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case series.

SETTING: Tertiary referral center.

SYNOPSIS: Researchers conducted a database search for patients who received CI surgery and other major surgeries between January 2009 and December 2021. They identified 35 patients who experienced 63 unique MES exposure events, with CI in vivo. Ten of the patients had bilateral CIs. Nine of the exposure events involved surgeries above the clavicle. The most common types of surgery included abdominal, thoracic/breast, spine, lower extremity orthopedic or vascular surgeries, and head and neck surgeries. Pre- and immediate postoperative speech recognition scores were not significantly different for patients using either consonant-nucleus-consonant or AzBio. Audiology and otolaryngology notes did not report any adverse events for any patient related to MES use. Overall findings showed that patients with CI are known to undergo surgery with MES, even in the head and neck, suggesting a lack of knowledge on contraindications to MES use in CI recipients.

CITATION: Cass ND, Lindquist NR, Bennett ML, et al. Monopolar electrosurgery with cochlear implants. Laryngoscope. 2023;133:933-937.

Filed Under: Literature Reviews, Otology/Neurotology, Otology/Neurotology, Practice Focus Tagged With: clinical outcomesIssue: April 2023

You Might Also Like:

  • No Evidence of CI Damage During Monopolar Cautery
  • Language Performance in Disabled Children with Cochlear Implants
  • Benefits of Cochlear Implants in Single-Sided Deafness Patients
  • U.K. Surgeons Report Being Negatively Affected by Adverse Events

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Do you use AI-powered scribes for documentation?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • How to: Positioning for Middle Cranial Fossa Repair of Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Endoscopic Ear Surgery: Advancements and Adoption Challenges 

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • The Importance of Time Away
    • Endoscopic Ear Surgery: Advancements and Adoption Challenges 
    • Reflections from a Past President of the Triological Society
    • ENT Surgeons Explore the Benefits and Challenges of AI-Powered Scribes: Revolutionizing Documentation in Healthcare
    • How To: Open Expansion Laryngoplasty for Combined Glottic and Subglottic Stenosis

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939