• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Ancient Remedy for Chronic Rhinosinusitis Comes with Fresh Warnings

by David Bronstein • November 1, 2012

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

For a therapy rooted in ancient ayurvedic medicine, it is perhaps not surprising that there have not been many startling developments regarding nasal irrigation for chronic rhinosinusitis. A slow but steady increase in popularity, a few seminal studies and a Cochrane review documenting its safety and efficacy were about all one could point to in the way of newsworthy trends.

You Might Also Like

  • Tips for Treating Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Irrigation
  • CAM Therapy Effective in Treating Chronic Sinusitis
  • Report May Change Diagnosis, Management of Chronic Rhinosinusitis
  • Toward Better Outcomes: Avoid revision surgeries in chronic rhinosinusitis patients
Explore This Issue
November 2012

That all changed in February, when the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta announced that two patients had died from primary amebic meningoencephalitis (PAM) that had likely been caused by sinus irrigation with contaminated tap water. The culprit? Naegleria fowleri, a rare and usually lethal thermophilic amoeba that had colonized both patients’ household plumbing, according to the CDC and other infectious disease specialists, noted in a full report on the cases published online in August (Clin Infect Dis. DOI:10.1093/cid/cis626).

As a result of these cases, both the CDC and the FDA warned that only distilled, boiled or properly filtered water should be used when preparing saline solutions for nasal washes.

That caution gained even more traction in October, when a study linked eight cases of treatment-resistant chronic rhinosinusitis to tap water contaminated with another potentially dangerous organism—Mycobacterium. As in the CDC report, the patients had been regular users of nasal irrigation; the bacteria was traced to household plumbing; and the researchers concluded that patients should avoid sinus rinses with tap water and use sterile water instead (Emerg Infect Dis. 2012;18(10):1612-1617; doi: 10.3201/eid1810.120164).

Jonathan S. Yoder, coordinator for the waterborne disease outbreak surveillance system at the CDC, helped put the risks posed by the N. fowleri infections, which have so far garnered the most attention, in perspective. “These are very rare and tragic infections,” he told ENT Today. “And although the risk to people using tap water for nasal irrigation is extremely low—remember, these are the first two cases of PAM associated with nasal irrigation ever reported in the United States—we still think it prudent to use water that is distilled, filtered or previously boiled.”

Yoder said he understands that following the recommendation will add an extra layer of logistics to the nasal irrigation process. But given the rapidly progressing nature of the rare N. fowleri infections—both patients died within a week of exhibiting symptoms and after repeated courses of treatment, including liposomal amphotericin B and rifampin—avoiding untreated tap water “is the prudent thing to do,” he said.

In fact, choosing appropriate water for preparing nasal irrigation solutions is the most effective means for preventing PAM because, according to the study, the salinity of nasal irrigation solutions does not begin to kill off N. fowleri for at least four to eight hours. And since the municipal water supply was found to be negative for the organism, all efforts to eradicate N. fowleri should be done at home at the source of the infection, said Yoder. (In the two cases reported, raising the heat of the water in the pipes killed off the N. Fowleri colonization.)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 | Single Page

Filed Under: Departments, Medical Education, Practice Focus, Rhinology Tagged With: nasal irrigation, rhinology, rhinosinusitis, Sinusitis, treatmentIssue: November 2012

You Might Also Like:

  • Tips for Treating Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Irrigation
  • CAM Therapy Effective in Treating Chronic Sinusitis
  • Report May Change Diagnosis, Management of Chronic Rhinosinusitis
  • Toward Better Outcomes: Avoid revision surgeries in chronic rhinosinusitis patients

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939