• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Audit Agony: Prepare yourself as insurers look to recoup funds

by Richard Quinn • July 2, 2010

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Hayes Wanamaker, MD, an otolaryngologist in Syracuse, N.Y., refers to the recovery audit process of insurance carriers as the proverbial camel’s nose under the tent.

You Might Also Like

  • Avoid the Hot Seat: How to prepare for a CMS audit
  • Proposed Legislation Could Speed Up Audit Process, Increase Transparency
  • When Dealing with Insurers, Electronic Payment Tools May be an Otolaryngologist’s Best Friend
  • The Opt-Outs: Otolaryngologists extol the benefits of third-party independence
Explore This Issue
July 2010

A partner at Central New York ENT Consultants and chief of otolaryngology at Crouse Hospital in Syracuse, Dr. Wanamaker has been audited by carriers several times in the past few years, and the experience is always similar: The insurance company comes into the physician’s office on a premise like the review of billing directly related to treatment of allergy-related issues. But, while culling through records related to that topic, the insurer starts looking at evaluation and management coding, extrapolates a package of records over the course of the practice and then presents the audited office with a bill that can easily be in the hundreds of thousands of dollars.

“You may get a $300,000 request for a repayment reduced to $50,000 or $100,000, and it will cost you $30,000, $40,000, $50,000 in legal fees,” Dr. Wanamaker said. “They make it so painful to challenge them or take them on that it can ruin your practice.”

The situation is only going to become more acute over the coming months and years as carriers continue to scrap to recoup dollars amid changing federal rules. The government is getting in on the action, as well: The U.S. Government Accountability Office released a report in late March that pushed the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services to become even more aggressive in recovering money from physicians. The result was the launch of the Recovery Audit Contractor (RAC) program, which officially began in February with the aim of reducing improper Medicare payments.

“GAO recommends that CMS improve its corrective action process by designating responsible personnel with authority to evaluate and promptly address RAC-identified vulnerabilities to reduce improper payments,” the report reads. Put more simply by a health care website: “Providers haven’t even begun to feel the true impact of the dreaded RAC program.”

“Before you let them in the door, as best you’re able, agree up front what (they’re) looking at, even if that’s a phone call to your local medical director.”
—Hayes Wanamaker, MD

Protect Yourself

Otolaryngologists can put themselves in position to handle the process, though. While America’s Health Insurance Plans, a trade group representing carriers, did not respond to several requests for comment, health care attorneys, billing professionals and physicians say diligence and attention to detail can protect even the smallest of practices. Some of the advice is hidden-in-plain-sight simplistic: Make sure to follow the rules of your contracts with individual insurance carriers. But adhering to the sometimes labyrinthine rules of the contracts first requires a detailed knowledge of what those legal documents say.

Pages: 1 2 3 | Single Page

Filed Under: Departments, Legal Matters, Practice Management Tagged With: audit, billing and coding, legal, Medicare, practice management, reimbursementIssue: July 2010

You Might Also Like:

  • Avoid the Hot Seat: How to prepare for a CMS audit
  • Proposed Legislation Could Speed Up Audit Process, Increase Transparency
  • When Dealing with Insurers, Electronic Payment Tools May be an Otolaryngologist’s Best Friend
  • The Opt-Outs: Otolaryngologists extol the benefits of third-party independence

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939