• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Audit Agony: Prepare yourself as insurers look to recoup funds

by Richard Quinn • July 2, 2010

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Another option that helps to protect against audits is to band together in shared-services scenarios sometimes referred to as independent practice associations. The arrangements may require approval by state officials, but the advantage of physicians working together is “bargaining clout,” Einiger said. Many physicians quietly grumble that insurance carriers prefer to target smaller practices because they are less able to fight back than the larger institutions. That argument can be mitigated when practices remain individual for medical purposes but share risks and services such as supplies or electronic medical records (EMRs), he added. Dr. Wanamaker also urged physicians not to be cowed by a carrier just because an audit has been initiated. At that point, carefully review the audit parameters to ensure that the practice is being treated fairly. “Before you let them in the door, as best you’re able, agree up front what (they’re) looking at, even if that’s a phone call to your local medical director,” he said. “Box in the scope of their investigation.”

You Might Also Like

  • Avoid the Hot Seat: How to prepare for a CMS audit
  • Proposed Legislation Could Speed Up Audit Process, Increase Transparency
  • When Dealing with Insurers, Electronic Payment Tools May be an Otolaryngologist’s Best Friend
  • The Opt-Outs: Otolaryngologists extol the benefits of third-party independence
Explore This Issue
July 2010

The last time Dr. Wanamaker’s practice was audited, the question was whether bilateral procedures had been correctly billed and paid. “We asked for the list of patients they had questions on,” he recalled. “And we looked at it first, and we found that a third of the charts they wanted to look at fell outside their allowable scope of inquiry. The first thing we did is we went back to them and said, ‘This chart, this chart and that chart, you’re not allowed to look at this.’”

Of course, the best defense for any audit is to be doing the right thing. And whether that’s accomplished via the hiring of an accredited coding expert to ensure a practice’s compliance or keeping an attorney on retainer to help implement procedures for that compliance—if an audit can’t find a mistake, then the issue is moot.

“First, of all, you have to do the job properly,” Dr. Wanamaker said. “You may not like the rules, but the rules are what the rules are. You have to follow them.”

Pages: 1 2 3 | Single Page

Filed Under: Departments, Legal Matters, Practice Management Tagged With: audit, billing and coding, legal, Medicare, practice management, reimbursementIssue: July 2010

You Might Also Like:

  • Avoid the Hot Seat: How to prepare for a CMS audit
  • Proposed Legislation Could Speed Up Audit Process, Increase Transparency
  • When Dealing with Insurers, Electronic Payment Tools May be an Otolaryngologist’s Best Friend
  • The Opt-Outs: Otolaryngologists extol the benefits of third-party independence

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939