• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Better Positioning During Microlaryngeal Surgery May Help Prevent Surgeon Injury

by Amy E. Hamaker • March 9, 2015

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

How does ergonomic positioning for microlaryngeal surgery (MLS) affect muscle fatigue and pain in the upper back, cervical, and arm muscles?

Background: Musculoskeletal symptoms associated with performing MLS are common, and there is a lack of insight regarding good ergonomics during this surgery. Surgeons unknowingly place themselves at higher risk of musculoskeletal injury if accommodations to avoid pain, muscle fatigue, and number of repetitions associated with MLS are not evaluated and compensated for.

You Might Also Like

  • Poor Ergonomics During Surgery Increase Musculoskeletal Injury Risk
  • Do Parachutes Prevent Death, Major Traumatic Injury?
  • How Surgical Ergonomics Impact Surgeon Wellbeing, Outcomes, and Careers
  • Oral/Maxillofacial Surgery Most Common Class to Result in Facial Nerve Injury
Explore This Issue
March 2015

Study design: Individual randomized counterbalanced design study on 18 otolaryngology residents/fellows.

Setting: Training program at the University of Pittsburgh Voice Center, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Penn.

Synopsis: Participants were trained to perform a simulated surgical task consisting of bimanual, ambidextrous, sequential, and repetitive vocal-fold palpation with blunt laryngeal dissectors. Participants performed a simulated surgical task for 15 minutes without stopping, took a 15-minute break, and then repeated the task in a different ergonomic position. Rapid Upper Limb Assessment scores were significantly different between favorable and unfavorable positions, and the number of microbreaks was statistically different between the two. Participants in the favorable position completed significantly more task repetitions. The greatest average electromyographic amplitude differences between positions were noted for the lower trapezius and cervical trapezius, with increased amplitude in the unfavorable position. On average, participants reported greater pain in the unfavorable position; pain was significantly greater in the unfavorable position for the anterior shoulder and posterior shoulder. Participants found the favorable position much easier to use.

Bottom line: There is electromyographic evidence of decreased muscle activation and fatigue and self-reported pain with a more favorable microsurgical ergonomic position. This may help surgeons avoid musculoskeletal injuries.

Citation: Smith LJ, Trout JM, Sridhara SS, et al. Comparison of microsuspension laryngoscopy positions: A randomized, prospective study. Laryngoscope. 2015;125:649-654.

Filed Under: Laryngology, Literature Reviews Tagged With: ergonomic positioning, microlaryngeal surgeryIssue: March 2015

You Might Also Like:

  • Poor Ergonomics During Surgery Increase Musculoskeletal Injury Risk
  • Do Parachutes Prevent Death, Major Traumatic Injury?
  • How Surgical Ergonomics Impact Surgeon Wellbeing, Outcomes, and Careers
  • Oral/Maxillofacial Surgery Most Common Class to Result in Facial Nerve Injury

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Do you use AI-powered scribes for documentation?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Keeping Watch for Skin Cancers on the Head and Neck

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • The Importance of Time Away
    • Endoscopic Ear Surgery: Advancements and Adoption Challenges 
    • Reflections from a Past President of the Triological Society
    • ENT Surgeons Explore the Benefits and Challenges of AI-Powered Scribes: Revolutionizing Documentation in Healthcare
    • How To: Open Expansion Laryngoplasty for Combined Glottic and Subglottic Stenosis

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939