ENTtoday
  • Home
  • COVID-19
  • Practice Focus
    • Allergy
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Departments
    • Issue Archive
    • TRIO Best Practices
      • Allergy
      • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
      • Head and Neck
      • Laryngology
      • Otology/Neurotology
      • Pediatric
      • Rhinology
      • Sleep Medicine
    • Career Development
    • Case of the Month
    • Everyday Ethics
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Medical Education
    • Online Exclusives
    • Practice Management
    • Resident Focus
    • Rx: Wellness
    • Special Reports
    • Tech Talk
    • Viewpoint
    • What’s Your O.R. Playlist?
  • Literature Reviews
    • Allergy
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Events
    • Featured Events
    • TRIO Meetings
  • Contact Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Triological Society
    • Advertising Staff
    • Subscribe
  • Advertise
    • Place an Ad
    • Classifieds
    • Rate Card
  • Search

Do Parachutes Prevent Death, Major Traumatic Injury?

by Amy E. Hamaker • June 9, 2019

  • Tweet
  • Email
Print-Friendly Version

You Might Also Like

  • Nimodipine May Improve Vocal Fold or Facial Motion After Injury
  • Better Positioning During Microlaryngeal Surgery May Help Prevent Surgeon Injury
  • Monitoring Tracheal Tube Cuff Pressures in the ICU Can Prevent Injury
  • Head and Neck Chemo Delays Over 14 Weeks Increase Risk of Death
Explore This Issue
June 2019

Comment: This is a follow-up to the original systematic review on parachute use to prevent death and major trauma related to gravitational challenge, published in BMJ in 2003. While the authors found no statistically significant benefit of parachutes, they were only able to enroll participants on small stationary aircraft on the ground and thus cautioned against extrapolation of their findings to high-altitude jumps.

Though the intent was satirical, the authors’ conclusion is certainly relevant in a research culture that values randomized controlled trials above all other types of research. The authors conclude: “When beliefs regarding the effectiveness of an intervention exist in the community, randomized trials might selectively enroll individuals with a lower perceived likelihood of benefit, thus diminishing the applicability of the results to clinical practice.”—Andres Bur, MD

Does using a parachute prevent death or major traumatic injury when jumping from an aircraft?

Bottom Line: Parachute use did not reduce death or major traumatic injury when jumping from aircraft in the first randomized evaluation of this intervention. However, the trial was only able to enroll participants on small stationary aircraft on the ground, suggesting cautious extrapolation to high altitude jumps. When beliefs regarding the effectiveness of an intervention exist in the community, randomized trials might selectively enroll individuals with a lower perceived likelihood of benefit, thus diminishing the applicability of the results to clinical practice.

Design: Randomized controlled trial.

Setting: Private or commercial aircraft between September 2017 and August 2018.

Synopsis: A total of 92 aircraft passengers aged 18 and over were screened for participation, and 23 agreed to be enrolled and were randomized. Participants jumped from an aircraft (airplane or helicopter) with a parachute versus an empty backpack (unblinded). The main outcome measure was composite of death or major traumatic injury (defined by an injury severity score higher than 15) upon impact with the ground measured immediately after landing. Parachute use did not significantly reduce death or major injury (0% for parachute vs. 0% for control). This finding was consistent across multiple subgroups. Compared with individuals screened but not enrolled, participants included in the study were on aircraft at significantly lower altitude (mean of 0.6 m for participants vs. mean of 9,146 m for non-participants) and lower velocity (mean of 0 km/h vs. mean of 800 km/h).

Citation: Yeh RW, Valsdottir LR, Yeh MW, et al. Parachute use to prevent death and major trauma when jumping from aircraft: randomized controlled trial. BMJ. 2018;363:k5094.

Pages: 1 2 | Single Page

Filed Under: Literature Reviews Tagged With: randomized trials, RCTIssue: June 2019

You Might Also Like:

  • Nimodipine May Improve Vocal Fold or Facial Motion After Injury
  • Better Positioning During Microlaryngeal Surgery May Help Prevent Surgeon Injury
  • Monitoring Tracheal Tube Cuff Pressures in the ICU Can Prevent Injury
  • Head and Neck Chemo Delays Over 14 Weeks Increase Risk of Death

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

The Laryngoscope
Ensure you have all the latest research at your fingertips; Subscribe to The Laryngoscope today!

Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
Open access journal in otolaryngology – head and neck surgery is currently accepting submissions.

Classifieds

View the classified ads »

TRIO Best Practices

View the TRIO Best Practices »

Top Articles for Residents

  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Why More MDs, Medical Residents Are Choosing to Pursue Additional Academic Degrees
  • What Physicians Need to Know about Investing Before Hiring a Financial Advisor
  • Tips to Help You Regain Your Sense of Self
  • Should USMLE Step 1 Change from Numeric Score to Pass/Fail?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • Vertigo in the Elderly: What Does It Mean?
    • Experts Delve into Treatment Options for Laryngopharyngeal Reflux
    • Non-Acidic Reflux Explains Lack of Response to H2 Blockers and PPIs
    • How 3D Printing Is Transforming the Pediatric Otolaryngology Field
    • Vertigo in the Elderly: What Does It Mean?
    • New Developments in the Management of Eustachian Tube Dysfunction
    • Some Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Resists PPI Treatment
    • Eustachian Tuboplasty: A Potential New Option for Chronic Tube Dysfunction and Patulous Disease
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • Why Virtual Grand Rounds May Be Here to Stay
    • Otolaryngologist Leverages His Love of Pinball into Second Business
    • These New Imaging Advances May Help to Protect Parathyroids
    • Is the Training and Cost of a Fellowship Worth It? Here’s What Otolaryngologists Say
    • Which Otologic Procedures Poses the Greatest Risk of Aerosol Generation?

Polls

Have you used 3D-printed materials in your otolaryngology practice?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive
  • Home
  • Contact Us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use

Visit: The Triological Society • The Laryngoscope • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology

Wiley
© 2021 The Triological Society. All Rights Reserved.
ISSN 1559-4939

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
This site uses cookies: Find out more.