• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Breaking Down the New Guidelines on Cochlear Implants for Pediatric Single-Sided Deafness

by Nikki Kean • August 16, 2022

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Despite the FDA’s approval in 2019 of cochlear implants (CI) for children aged 5 years and older with single-sided deafness (SSD), not all clinicians are aware of the benefits of the procedure for these younger patients. To help attract attention to those benefits and provide guidance for CI candidacy, evaluation, and management of children with SSD, the American Cochlear Implant Alliance (ACIA) Task Force published new guidelines (Ear Hear. 2022;43:255-267).

You Might Also Like

  • Benefits of Cochlear Implants in Single-Sided Deafness Patients
  • Genetic Testing Is Appropriate for Some Pediatric Patients with Unilateral Hearing Loss or Single-Sided Deafness
  • How to Help Patients With Single-Sided Deafness Relearn Music
  • Psychosocial Aspects of Single-Sided Deafness Important to Consider in Patient Care
Explore This Issue
August 2022

Benefits of CI for SSD

The goal of cochlear implantation in these children is not only to achieve better speech understanding but also to provide bilateral input to encourage the development of binaural hearing, noted Lisa R. Park, AuD, a research assistant professor in the department of otolaryngology– head and neck surgery at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, and lead author of the ACIA guidelines. In fact, she stressed, “Cochlear implantation, previously reserved for individuals with bilateral sensorineural hearing loss, is the only SSD treatment that provides hearing to the affected ear and encourages binaural auditory stimulation of the brain.”

Matthew Bush, MD, PhD, MBA

The big gap within the FDA guideline is that it doesn’t address those children with congenital SSD, because if we’re implanting them at 5 years of age, many of their central neural pathways have reorganized to preclude optimal binaural hearing. —Matthew Bush, MD, PhD, MBA

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, SSD occurs in approximately 0.6 to 0.7 per 1,000 live births in the United States. By kindergarten, the incidence of SSD increases to approximately 2.5% to 6% of children. Multiple studies of SSD in adults and children have shown that CI can help to restore binaural functionality, improve quality of life, and facilitate reversal of neuroplasticity related to auditory deprivation in the pediatric population (J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2019;80:178-186).

One of the main challenges for children with SSD is spatial hearing in challenging listening environments, according to Matthew Bush, MD, PhD, MBA, professor and vice chair for research in the department of otolaryngology– head and neck surgery at the University of Kentucky Medical Center in Lexington. “The ability to pick out that voice of the parent, teacher, or classmate in the presence of background noise is much harder,” said Dr. Bush. “This difficulty may lead to a higher level of inattentiveness, which can lead to disruptive behaviors from the child and then, in turn, [affect] how parents interact with their child. So, there can be a downward spiral of maladaptive behavior changes that occur” (Otol Neurotol. 2017;38:1456-1462).

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 | Single Page

Filed Under: Features, Home Slider, Pediatric, Practice Focus Tagged With: Clinical Guidelines, cochlear impantsIssue: August 2022

You Might Also Like:

  • Benefits of Cochlear Implants in Single-Sided Deafness Patients
  • Genetic Testing Is Appropriate for Some Pediatric Patients with Unilateral Hearing Loss or Single-Sided Deafness
  • How to Help Patients With Single-Sided Deafness Relearn Music
  • Psychosocial Aspects of Single-Sided Deafness Important to Consider in Patient Care

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939